Tomorrow - We See if the Numbers are Skewed

[Charles West]

The revisions were entirely in the private sector, the jobs created were nearly entirely make work government jobs, not organic.

 

[Terrel L. Shields]

The revisions were entirely in the private sector,

And this revision is only for the first quarter - and further, these are beside the monthly revisions already posted.

 

[Elliott]

(Source: Stephen Moore)


Can you imagine if the BLS missed the owner's estimate of value by $50,000 and was accused of being racially biased?

 

[IlliniApp]

The revisions were entirely in the private sector, the jobs created were nearly entirely make work government jobs, not organic.

I saw they actually understated gov. jobs by a thousand.

 

[Lil Rhody]

So the Commerce Secretary was interviewed at the DNC and they played a clip of Trump talking about the jobs revision. When asked if it was a liability for the Dems. She actually said she didn't believe it because Trump said it. Maybe she was really the secretary for the Commerce Secretary

The commerce secretary is the former governor for my tiny little state. She had issues keeping the budget balanced her entire tenure and passed policies to enrich her family's business dealings. However, in 2015-2016 she was the ultimate Hillary Clinton shill and that type of behavior. more than merit, provides advancement opportunities in the political realm. And she looks just like the wicked witch of the West.

 

[Elliott]

Biden's Commerce Secretary tells ABC she’s ‘not familiar with’ major job number revision​

U.S. Secretary of Commerce and former Rhode Island governor Gina Raimondo for admitted to ABC News on Wednesday that she wasn’t "familiar" with the the major downward revision of jobs created in the past year.

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6360780858112

 

[Terrel L. Shields]

Commerce Dept head claims BLS numbers are a lie because Trump quoted the BLS stats. WTF?