• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Trump wants to get rid of Fannie & Freddie

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fannie and Freddie have contributed to the masses to get low down payment mortgages.
No other countries have such semi-government programs encouraging (even the less qualified) to buy homes.
The rich don't need Fannie. Common folks need them the most.
Yeah but they are operating very risky at the moment. Very risky for taxpayers and stock holders. Why do you think CFPB was so hard on many witnesses in the appraisal bias hearings?

Chopra ain't no dummie. He knows risk when he sees it. CFPB has authority over every person that appeared in those hearings.
 
Steve Forbes was right on this a long time ago:

“Actually, sound reforms are crucial to getting the housing market back on a sustainable growth path,” Forbes wrote. “Not so long ago it was the norm in this country to put down 20% on a house. Other abandoned customs: limiting a mortgage to no more than four or five times a family’s income, with the maturity of that debt rarely exceeding 20 years. Government pressure trashed these standard practices, which had once made the home mortgage the soundest of securities. We’re still living with the consequences of the federal government’s fecklessness.”
 
Appraisers participated in the destruction of the 20% down....
Did we not....
 
For all those clamoring that their debt has been repaid (hoping others will make their bad bets pay):
"In September 2008 Treasury bailed out Fannie and Freddie, promising to shore up each with as much as $100 billion. In return, they forced the companies to give Treasury 1 million shares of preferred stock, worth a total of $1 billion. These shares required the companies to pay quarterly cash dividends to the Treasury, and they included a protection device called a liquidation preference. This device means that the companies cannot raise new equity capital without first paying back the liquidation preference (now approximately $200 billion).

In May of 2009, the companies were still struggling, so Treasury promised to provide each with up to $200 billion.

In December 2009 the companies were still struggling, so Treasury changed its commitment formula, allowing it to provide more than $200 billion.

Even after these three bailouts, Fannie and Freddie were still struggling in 2012—so much, that they faced the prospect of borrowing from Treasury just to pay the dividends they owed Treasury.

Papering over this problem, Treasury amended the agreement once again, this time taking any profit that Fannie and Freddie managed to earn in order to satisfy the dividend payments.

It is true that, between 2008 and 2018, Fannie and Freddie paid back about $300 billion to Treasury, roughly $100 billion more in dividends than they received from Treasury. But this fact merely addresses the cash flows. It overlooks that Fannie and Freddie were able to pay these dividends only with the aid of successive bailouts, and it also ignores the risk that taxpayers were forced to take on through these bailouts.

Of course, these four bailouts are separate from the additional help that Fannie and Freddie received when the Fed and Treasury purchased trillions of dollars of Fannie’s and Freddie’s bonds and mortgage backed securities, thus staving off further losses that could have required even more bailouts."
 
Only idiots can believe these crooked, failed entities are sound. The Fed is keeping them afloat with off the books garbage:

"As of June 2024, the Fed held approximately $2.3 trillion of agency MBS, representing almost 30 percent of the outstanding balance in the agency MBS market."
 
All current licensed appraisers should refuse to accept GSE assignments....
Do your patriotic part....
:rof:
 
History repeats itself-Bush got rid of regulaitons and safe guards and after a boom the housing market crashed-2008, and next the financial markets - yet here again we go, down the same path.
 
Without a tax payer bailout maybe more need for quality value control & tighter underwriting.

But it can't be 1 big company only, then they get bailed out like the big banks and auto companies.
Everything has a cost. Without a payer bailout, the interest rates would be higher - just keep responsible guard rails in place for tax payer backed -
 
After September 11....
Housing was the only sector keeping the economy going....
Unfortunately, and as usual, wealthy/influential actors decide to act badly....
 
History repeats itself-Bush got rid of regulaitons and safe guards and after a boom the housing market crashed-2008, and next the financial markets - yet here again we go, down the same path.
Look at the little minded liberal making stuff up while demanding that others "prove it"! Miss Disinformation!

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top