- Joined
- Jan 14, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Colorado
I have been teaching that technique for years. Many appraisers still lump everything onto one line and then wonder why underwriters and reviewers question their adjustments.
Consider this. Two homes side by side ... one has a 500SF basement that is 70% finished. The other one has a 700SF basement that is 95% finished. How would you adjust these if you didn't use two lines? Lets say that the first one is my subject property and the second one is the comp.
One line one of the below grade area for the comp I would have 700SF 95%Fn. There is a difference of 200SF and I might adjust that at, say, $15 a square foot or a -3,000 FOR SIZE DIFFERENCE ONLY.
Now I am going to deal the the difference for finished area.
My subject has 350SF finished into 2Rm,1Bd,1BA. The entry would be 2Rm,1Bd,1Ba. The comparable has 665SF finished into 3Rm,2Bd,1Ba for a difference of 315SF. I might adjust the finish at, say, $10 a square foot or a minus adjustment of $3,150 rounded to -$3,200.
By using this method, the appraiser can account for both size difference and the difference in the amount of finished area. Many times, IN MY MARKET, the total adjustment (in this case $25 a square foot) might just be the same as I used for above grade (GLA) thus eliminating the argument..."you didn't count my walkout basement as living area and we spend all out time down there in the family room".
Two other things I typical do are: If it is a walkout, I do my adjustment for that under Functional Utility (very next line)...so I can really have three different adjustments for below grade areas. You could also separate walkout, garden level, and standard basement areas on this line. The other thing is to explain how I make my adjustments in my addenda so that no one has to ask the question you just did.
I also feel I should add this comment. Reviews should be done by very experienced appraisers who have seen just about every thing there is to see when it comes to residential appraising. USPAP says an appraiser or reviewer should be competent in property type, location, and methodology. Too often, lenders and AMCs send out reviews on the basis of the lowest bid. Most really experienced appraisers are too busy and have fees too high to get those review assignments. I knew of one appraiser, a trainee with less than 1 year experience, doing reviews IN MY MARKET for a company in DENVER. The supervisory appraiser never ever looked at the subject or the comps. Bad situation for everyone concerned.
Consider this. Two homes side by side ... one has a 500SF basement that is 70% finished. The other one has a 700SF basement that is 95% finished. How would you adjust these if you didn't use two lines? Lets say that the first one is my subject property and the second one is the comp.
One line one of the below grade area for the comp I would have 700SF 95%Fn. There is a difference of 200SF and I might adjust that at, say, $15 a square foot or a -3,000 FOR SIZE DIFFERENCE ONLY.
Now I am going to deal the the difference for finished area.
My subject has 350SF finished into 2Rm,1Bd,1BA. The entry would be 2Rm,1Bd,1Ba. The comparable has 665SF finished into 3Rm,2Bd,1Ba for a difference of 315SF. I might adjust the finish at, say, $10 a square foot or a minus adjustment of $3,150 rounded to -$3,200.
By using this method, the appraiser can account for both size difference and the difference in the amount of finished area. Many times, IN MY MARKET, the total adjustment (in this case $25 a square foot) might just be the same as I used for above grade (GLA) thus eliminating the argument..."you didn't count my walkout basement as living area and we spend all out time down there in the family room".
Two other things I typical do are: If it is a walkout, I do my adjustment for that under Functional Utility (very next line)...so I can really have three different adjustments for below grade areas. You could also separate walkout, garden level, and standard basement areas on this line. The other thing is to explain how I make my adjustments in my addenda so that no one has to ask the question you just did.
I also feel I should add this comment. Reviews should be done by very experienced appraisers who have seen just about every thing there is to see when it comes to residential appraising. USPAP says an appraiser or reviewer should be competent in property type, location, and methodology. Too often, lenders and AMCs send out reviews on the basis of the lowest bid. Most really experienced appraisers are too busy and have fees too high to get those review assignments. I knew of one appraiser, a trainee with less than 1 year experience, doing reviews IN MY MARKET for a company in DENVER. The supervisory appraiser never ever looked at the subject or the comps. Bad situation for everyone concerned.
Last edited: