Couch Potato
Elite Member
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2004
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- North Carolina
It can be relevant. As Greg Boyd notes, It could indicate the sale price was unrelated to the improvements. Subsequent actions after the sale may or may not be relevant to evaluating the comparable sale. Failing to allow for or to address such possibilities is negligence IMHO.I've had that happen but you are not using the comp based on the date you view it. The comp is being considered in it's condition as of the date of it's sale. The fact that it was torn down following the sale has no relevancy at all on the sales price and terms used in the grid.