Terrel L. Shields, post: Ask bankers if they think they are typically motivated within the MV definition.
The MV definition, deliberately does not define what comprises "typically motivated ". That's because it's meant to be an umbrella to encompass the wide range of motivations present of buyers and sellers. It;s up to the appraiser to determine FROM THE MARKET what comprises "typically motivated" for a subject.
When 90% of sales are REO and 10% are typically motivated between real sellers and buyers and those 10% are bringing 30% or more money, then they are the uncompelled market.
If you take it upon yourself to ignore 90% of the market and proclaim the t0% "typically motivated", that is misleading. REO homes, if exposed to open market and allowed a reasonable marketing time and no special financing or terms present, their sale met the definition of a MV transaction. If their prices are lower than "other sales" that can be due to their physical condition or other factors, including that if lots of REO properties are present , the typically motivated buyer for them can be investors and flippers whose goal is to pay as little as possible.
When 90% of the properties are REO owned, their sellers have the typical motivations for that market segment. The question is why 10% of houses are selling for 30% more .. Are the 10% flip sales? If so, were they repaired or upgraded ? If your subject was repaired and upgraded by a property flipper, it's comps are the other 10% that have been flipped /repaired.
But if your subject is original /same dated condition to the other 90% ( assuming the 90% are in dated condition), then those REO similar condition properties are competition for subject property.
Note, If all the properties were in the same dated condition and 10% of buyers paid 30% more for the sole reason the dated condition home is not REO owned, the 10% buyer overpaid, rather then the other 90% sold "under market"
As long as the terms of sale are MV terms, no matter who owns the property, it is a MV term sale. Who owns the property can vary widely, from a private seller to a spec home builder to a national builder to a flipper to a bank . How each of their homes, if exposed to the open market when listed / offered is the subject of our appraisal.
The terms of sale, not the ownership, is what determines if the sale was MV, LV or DV for analysis purpose. A private owner can be under compulsion to sell in a limited time frame and the property not given adequate market exposure nor advertising effort. It was the terms of sale and market exposure, not the ownership, that qualifies a transaction as meeting a value definition.