• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

vacancy expenses

Status
Not open for further replies.
Even many banks who had long-term leases are now abandoning theior spaces as a result of the continuing consolidation in the banking industry. ANd while in general I agree that it is dependent on the credit quality of the tenant, and what is general practive in the area, I have noticed that most people whether brokers, owners, investors, and appraisers that are active in the net lease market will generally make some allowance.
 
As Terrell stated - uniformity of application. If you are going to utilize vacancy and credit loss allowances in the direct cap pro forma, just make sure you develop comparable cap rates by adjusting reported comparable sale NNN lease income for the same allowance.

If a comparable cap rate is based upon a comparable sale's unadjusted in-place NNN income and price per SF and you apply that rate to a subject's NNN contract income adjusted for vacancy and collection loss, you may understate the subject's value by the same percentage adjustment made for vacancy and collection loss.
 
No one wakes up in the morning and decides it is a good day to get hit by a bus.

My two cents is that if you use cap rates developed from sales of NNN leased property and don't apply deductions for vacancy and credit loss prior to calculating the rate, then don't apply deductions for vacancy and credit loss for the subject property in the direct cap pro forma. The cap rate developed in those sales infers expectations of vacancy and credit loss.

Agree. Harder said than done at times, but best method when possible.
 
The Income Approach is about market reaction, as are all the approaches at their core. If you are doing a market value appraisal, then the vacancy rate that's used in your analysis should be the market rate applied against the market rent.
 
The Income Approach is about market reaction, as are all the approaches at their core. If you are doing a market value appraisal, then the vacancy rate that's used in your analysis should be the market rate applied against the market rent.

And that approach would give you a fee simple value, which is good for seeing the effect measured against the leased fee, but I'm sure he's trying to determine the value of the leased fee interest here, no?
 
The Income Approach is about market reaction, as are all the approaches at their core. If you are doing a market value appraisal, then the vacancy rate that's used in your analysis should be the market rate applied against the market rent.

And as long as you develop comparable cap rates by adjusting comparable sale NOI in-place for the same factors (vacancy and collection loss), you would be correct.

However, if you don't adjust NOI in-place for those factors, the resulting cap rate infers market expectations of those factors and you should not perform double adjustments by using a cap rate developed in that manner and then making an adjustment for vacancy and collection loss in your pro forma.

If you want to get really technical about valuing the fee simple interest of an investment property, we need to start analyzing the relationship of the comparable sale contract rents to market rent.
 
As others have noted, consistent treatment of capitalization rate extraction is very important.

The "absolute" or "bonded" national-credit very long term leases (e.g., Walgreens) make up a specialty investor market. A teasingly stereotype it as the little old lady who wants to retire to Florida and play golf and doesn't want to be bothered with property management headaches. She also doesn't want to incur capital gains taxes so she 1031-exchanges out of the active management generic properties. These investors don't seem to subtract a vacancy factor but rather load tenant credit risk, default risk, term structure, and renewal option risk into the cap rate.

For the more generic local credit office/warehouse/retail 10 year lease, I would take out a vacancy factor. At the end of year 10 there will be a period of vacancy. The vacancy will depend on the property type, building's condition, market conditions, etc. Such a vacancy might be 3, 6, 12, 15, 18, 24 months, etc. CoStar Analytic reports can provide a guide to how long comparable space has sat on the market. You can also simply be observant of how long similar buildings remain vacant.

For example, say a building following the 10 year lease would be vacant for 0.5 years. A simple guide is 4.8% (=10 yrs / 10.5 yrs).

However, because of the impact of the present value of the dollar, it overstates the vacancy. A DCF will handle this by itself, but as I rely on direct cap for my client's assignments, I have a little Excel sheet that let's me play with this.

The present value (PV) of 10 years of cash flow (an EGI) can be divided by PV of 10.5 years (=10+0.5) of the PGI (as if it was fully occupied). At a 10% discount rate, this example would compute 6.3059 PV factor of the EGI occupancy. Because the occupancy-vacancy process is chained a reversion factor has to be computed as a sinking fund factor. In this example it is 0.3515 PV of the reversion divided by of the occupancy divided by 6.8368 (compounded monthly). It would be occupied 97.38% of the 10.5 years or vacant 2.62% years. Depending on how investors/brokers see things, then it could be rounded to 0% or 5% or 3%, and whatever. As a PV calculation, the model reflects a chain of this occupancy pattern, i.e., years 1-10 occupied, year 10.0 to 10.5 yr vacant, years 10.5 to 20.5 occupied, 1/2 yr vacant, years 21-31 occupied, etc.

Obviously this is not the only way to observe vacancy but it has been a handy tool to "picture" the implications of different market conditions. When I use 12 months of vacancy at end of 10 years, the imputed vacancy rate rises to 5.0%. It helps me appreciate vacancy rates between a good retail location with quick lease up times vs. a blighted location with lingering vacant space.

Default risk is slightly different attribute than the physical vacancy. Default risk could be loaded into the physical vacancy rate or loaded into the capitalization rate, just mirror the market and don't over/under count.
 
Should there also be a deduction for taxes and other expenses for the times of vacancy. Estimated vacancy rate for the area is 12%

Would landlords pass along these expenses to the rest of the tenants?
 
Would landlords pass along these expenses to the rest of the tenants?

That is actually an excellent question and good luck getting anyone to answer it if you don't have the lease in hand.
 
I've got at least 100 leases stacked up on my "leases" shelf right behind me. Some do, some don't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top