• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Valuation Service Vs. Appraisal Practive

Status
Not open for further replies.
Scott,
What would you be consulting on, and what training and experience other than appraisal skills would you be using? If you are consulting with buyers and sellers, it would seem to me that they would be looking to you for value conclusions. No matter what you call it, that is appraisal practice.
 
Scott,

Are you doing appraisals or not?

You will need to define for yourself and your clients exactly what you are and aren't doing. There's no reason a licensed appraiser can't also hold a real estate license, an SEC Series 7 License, car salesman license and a business license, all at the same time. No need to allow any of these licenses to go inactive simply because you're qualified to do other things.

With respect to your new job, there's a big difference between analyzing a commercial property and making recommendations about it for a client or employer in a capacity wherein you are clearly an advocate and not an appraiser; and valuing a property as an objective, unbiased and otherwise uninvolved appraiser. Just a hint here: whether or not you comply with SR2-3 by signing a certification for your appraisals is not the dividing line.

Let's say you do an analysis of an income property that includes a review of the income stream itself, a summary of comparable data, comparisons between that data and your subject, and concludes with some recommendations about exposure time, marketing time, and even potential pricing, etc. If a third party comes along and looks at your work product, and then interprets your work as an unbiased opinion of value then you have a problem. If that party can understand from looking at your work that you are not attempting to represent yourself as unbiased, nor in the capacity as an appraiser, then your work probably isn't going to cause problems.

You will not be able to do this kind of work by using standard appraisal report formats and then get away from being held accountable for it as an appraiser by excluding your certifications or using black and white photos or even by crossing out and substituting the word "Consulting Report" every time the form uses "Appraisal Report".

The term "Administrative" got used up there in one of the previous responses, as in "Administrative Review". Although I don't think it was you who brought it up, I'll address it anyway. Users of appraisal services do administrative reviews. What that means is that people who are engaged in making decisions about the property can review appraisal work in an administrative capacity. Even licensed appraisers can do this, if their function is to make a decision about the property rather than the appraisal. Examples of this would include if the person were working with the property as a property manager, or as a loan officer, or as a sales agent. However, the moment the focus of that activity switches from the disposition of the property to the quality of the appraisal report or the appraiser's work, then that person is engaged in a technical review as defined in the USPAP and all of those rules apply. If you're doing both, then you're doing both. Like most other types of valuation services, these functions need not be mutually exclusive.

Consider this. If tap dancing around the "value opinion" vs. "potential pricing" issue and playing with ambiguities doesn't appeal to you, you might try playing it straight and retaining your role as an unbiased appraiser, same as you would if you were an employee at a bank. Mere employment status doesn't automatically impugn your status as an unbiased appraiser unless you let it. It this applies to your situation, you can simply acknowledge that your work consists of developing appraisals and tailor them by using an appropriate scope of work, aimed specifically at your intended users and intended uses. Obviously, your clients will have different requirements than the average bank would have, and your work could look very different and still suffice within that scope.

The bottom line here is that it probably is easier to only own one hat. But if you do wear multiple hats, you will want to make sure that each hat is well identified in big bold neon letters, and that you never wear or even appear to wear the wrong hat for what you are doing. As others have already suggested, if you're worried about your license, you should contact your state board for clarification. They can probably assist you in erecting some fences that will keep your competing job descriptions from stepping on each other.
 
Scott,

As an appraiser, if you are providing appraisal consulting services, you must still conform to USPAP Standards 4 & 5, including providing a signed certification, unless the service does not require an opinion of value (per line 1339-1344).
 
Scott - specifically define "consulting services", please. What is the broker expecting specifically and how are you being paid?
 
Scott,
I don't know what state you're in, so you'll have to do your own checking with regard to this. Whether what you do constitutes "appraisal" or not is determined by state law in Tennessee. It says that thou shalt not give an opinion of value of real property unless thou art a certified or licensed appraiser. They go on to let BPO's in without a license or certification as long as they're labeled "this is not an appraisal." Further, "suggested listing price" and "suggested sale price" are excluded. If you give an opinion of value of real property, you must comply with USPAP in Tennessee. If you do not give such an opinion, there's no regulation.

So, in my state, I can do "appraisal consulting assignments" all day long, practice advocacy for one side or the other (as long as I don't give a value opinion), and generally perform shenanigans that'd get me tossed off this forum summarily--but I won't be breaking the law, and I won't be subject to the jurisdiction of the Appraisers' Commission. Would I do any of that that? No.

As others have pointed out, public perceiption tends to govern what I can do. I want the public to perceive me as a professional, unbiased, crabby and combative old SOB whose opinion of value can, literally, be "taken to the bank," and disputed at their peril. I won't do anything to jeopardize that perception.

So your dilemma breaks down into two parts: 1) Can you legally do it? and 2) Should you?
 
Do you possess only an appraisal license or do you plan to do this work under a broker or financial planner or some other license?
2 Well, which are you providing - an appraisal or consulting service?

I only hold an appraiser license and will be working with a broker.
The services would all be consulting serivces, in my opinon.

Scott,
The precise nature of your work remains a mystery, so all answers will continue to be guesses.
On question 1, people legally engage in different forms business activity because the government has granted some type of licence or permit for someone to engage in that activity. You are either working under your own appraisal license or under that broker’s license. That has a lot to do with whether you are “an appraiser.”
On question 2, you say these are consulting services in your opinion, But what are they in reality? :D
 
Everyone here as avoided the obvious word. Are you living in a MANDATORY state? Some states allow you to perform services outside the scope of appraising. Even many MANDATORY states have exceptions. Almost all states make exception for BPOs and CMAs. Some allow non-appraisal appraisals so long as it is not a FRT and it states that it was not intended to conform to USPAP, etc. etc.

"Evaluations", "Valuations" (remember in Canada, Briton, etc. appraisers are called Valuers, Valuators, Chartered Surveyors,or Evaluators, not appraisers) is just parsing words unless you have a specific definition available.

Don't confuse the issue of consulting. Consulting that arrives at a value conclusion must conform to Std 1 and 2, as well as 5, period.

Time to sit down and READ your STATE LAW (not USPAP). STATE LAW will spell it out. In my state a Registered Appraiser (Trainee) can appraise ANYTHING of ANY VALUE so long it is not for a Fed Rel. Transaction and states so. Even personal property appraisers are supposed to REGISTER with the state to testify in State Court, though they are not required to conform to USPAP. IF they appraise a FRT or want credit towards a Certification, they must get the co-signature of a CERTIFIED OR LICENSED appraiser. Prior to 2001 an appraiser could do a host of things by merely not stamping the report or calling it an "Appraisal' or claiming it complied with USPAP. The Registered appraiser law changed that.

Your state law is the key to the answer. As for appearances, if you are selling your service as an appraiser then providing something less, I would concern myself with Pamela's remarks. I have been studying a report, provided by a CG with extensive court experience, who appraised a mineral / producing oil well property being sold on the court house steps. He carefully tried to separate his "appraisal service" [a contract requirement] by calling it an "Evaluation". Why, Lord only knows. He stamped it with an appraisal license. etc. etc.
But, so long as you are not holding your service out as certified appraisal service, then I see no problem so long as your state allows for non-appraiser appraisals. And many states do, and/or make exceptions to the Mandatory rules.
 
Terry,
I didn’t avoid state law – just didn’t get that far yet. Need to find out if it is appraising or not and whether he is working under his own license or not. If he is not doing valuations and not working under his own license, it won’t matter if the state is mandatory or not.

Some states allow you to perform services outside the scope of appraising.
Dont' they all? Otherwise no one could ever get a review done in state.
 
Perhaps I should say outside the scope of arriving at a value conclusion. The question is what constitutes 'appraisal' vs 'evaluation' or 'valuation'.

ps.- I recently stumbled across your article in NAIFA appraiser gram 4/03 issue on Re-Examining the Unity Doctrine and must applaude your insight.

ter
 
Terry,
Just about any kind of property or market analysis and advice is permissible under most state law and USPAP. All the stuff (eg investment analysis) that used to be mentioned in Std 4, but got removed in 2001 is still "appraisal practice." However, that work is not controlled by any Std. - only the Rules.

Thanks for the kind words. There is sequel to that in the October. I am not sure you would find that one as insightful.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top