• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Vendor agreements with "hold harmless"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Biting forbidden fruit doesn't excuse one from comparing apples to oranges.

Mr. Wiley,

Your message just does not feel complete to me. You continue to technically make correct statements. Only it seems parts are left out that really need to be discussed.

<...... snip...... >



Counting just the agreements required to produce and deliver that one report, I found 15 of them, and I probably missed some. I had to sign one in order to:
  • use the basic forms software
Apples to oranges. In this case the appraiser has not given up control of being able to positively, for certain, the ability of being able to review the final product prior to transmission to the appraiser's client. There is no concern that some third party in the middle of that transmission may be altering the final product or perhaps not really delivering the final product in full. Nor is there a conversion program that the appraiser's basic form software company has in the past complained about not being adequate for a 100% true conversion of what that form software company is providing to their customers. The appraisers work product being thrown out of a WYSIWYG situation, their digital signature being made vulnerable and taken out of their control, (See USPAP.. I know you know all about this.) and the appraisers having no idea what in fact is really being delivered on the opposite end of the transmission to their client.

use the mapping software
use the sketch software
create the PDF
apply the digital signature

See my words above on all of these.

use the portal

Ok, now we have a change. Again, see my words above. What you are leaving out is the very crucial moment just before the appraiser relinguished control to a third party and just after the appraiser did. Every one of your examples would have to involve indemnification and hold harmless acts or ommissions PRIOR to the appraiser relinguishing control of the final work product before delivery. The AP indemnification and hold harmless not only involves possible acts and ommissions prior to this trigger point, due to use of their software, but also during transmission and afterwards when all of those possible acts and ommissions would be occurring AFTER the appraiser no longer has any control over the situation.

More than the above, and I'll get to see if my crystal ball is any good on this one because I'll admit I am taking a WAG on it. But my common sense tells me that no insurance company offers a general liability policy that allows the insured to brainlessly agree to any indemnification and hold harmless clauses in any and all contracts, regardless of how those clauses are worded and regardless of the circumstances, and remain insured for any and all situations of having done so. If there is such an offering available to us in the insurance world, I will predict that something on the order of 90% of residential appraisers could not afford the premiums to obtain the insurance.

So, as you are touting your general liability policy, perhaps you'd be so kind as to post what insurance company is offering the above? A general policy that covers us regardless of what we sign without us forwarding that specific contract BEFORE we sign it to the insurance company in order to obtain a specific writer for our coverage prior to signing?

I don't know about others on the forum, but I would want to see for myself an insurance company that agrees to cover an insured that signs away the farm to cover the gross negligence, AND any and all legal costs, of a not specifically policy covered third party and ALL of the third parties unidentified business partners or suppliers. Because that insurance company just pretty much insured the acts and ommissions of the entire world. Even the lender involved because the lender, the appraiser's client, probably sent "data" through AP to the appraiser and so became a "data" provider. I want to see the premium for that kind of coverage.

Perhaps some have been working totally unaware of the things they have agreed to and the liability they have taken on. These hold harmless/indemnification clauses are far more common than most realize. Anyone working without a good general liability policy is playing with fire.

Mr. Wiley, I agree with your suggestion. I am sure many appraisers have done exactly as you suggest. I could be completely incorrect in my thinking this morning. But at the moment I bet a "good" general liability policy that actually 100% covers an appraiser AFTER the fact of giving up control, covers the acts and ommissions endlessly and forever of other parties that are not covered and not named in the policy, that occur after that point in time of the passing of control, doesn't really exist.

At this moment I would think the only action to limit the liabilty would be to negociate the contract so that the other parties possible forms of negligence are NOT protected from litigation by the appraiser. Everyone can go see now if I am right or wrong. I'll be interested in the answers.

Webbed.
 
Last edited:
USPAP SOW RULE consideration
Lender client orders a SFR appraisal stipulating reporting format MUST be on a Fannie 1004_05 appraisal report form as designed published and required by Fannie.

As a technical point, the Scope of Work Rule applies to appraisal development, not reporting.

Does anyone have any Lender Assignment form, or announcement, regulation revision, or statement from the GSES which authorizes an Appraiser who accepts such an order to deliver an appraisal report in ANY OTHER format?

Software companies can make modifications to the presentation as along as the sequence of the information and the information itself is as it appears on the hard-copy form.

http://www.allregs.com/efnma/index....0&tx=/&sx=FNMA/selling/part-xi/xi-ch-2/xi-203

A URAR is not required to be identical to the original URAR posted on Fannie’s web site. This was covered in detail in a previous thread. If one compares a URAR form generated by different software vendors there are lots of small differences.
 
In this case the appraiser has not given up control of being able to positively, for certain, the ability of being able to review the final product prior to transmission to the appraiser's client.

They have not given up the ability to review prior to transmission when they use AP either. Whether I send a report in PDF format or AIReady fomat I absolutely have the ability to see what I am sending before I send it. All appraisers have that capability, though some apparently don't know how to do it.

Some keep clinging to the false claim that an AIReady report is converted enroute. It is not, and no matter how many people say that, it is not true. I convert the report on my computer. I can see it before I send it, and I am responsible for its contents.

Is there a 100% guarantee that the client will get what I send? Other than hand delivery of a paper version, there is no such guarantee with any delivery method.

I have seen altered reports, many of them in fact. All were originally sent as PDF files. Some were sent via email, and some were sent via portal.

There is no concern that some third party in the middle of that transmission may be altering the final product or perhaps not really delivering the final product in full.

I might have such concerns if someone could actually prove some of the claims posted. So far the only thing I have seen is the admission by one company that they inserted watermarks on reports.

These arguments and allegations have been floated very publicly for a long, long time time. I am an appraiser. Show me the data that supports the conclusion. Credibility requires support by evidence.

Is an appraiser who agrees to indemnification langauge increasing risk? Absoultely. Will general liability protect you? That depends on the nature of the claim and the terms of the policy. The posts in this thread clearly show that some appraisers don't undertand what E&O is and what it covers, so I don't have much faith that those same people understand general liability insuance any better. I suggest consulting an insurance professional for guidance.
 
Mr. Wiley,

Originally Posted by Webbed Feet
In this case the appraiser has not given up control of being able to positively, for certain, the ability of being able to review the final product prior to transmission to the appraiser's client.

You misunderstood what I meant. I probably could have worded it better. When I said able to review for certain prior to tranmission to the appraiser's client... I did not mean the ENV file the appraiser sent to AP. I meant whatever it was AP sent to the appraiser's client AFTER the appraiser sent the ENV file to AP. Something being transmitted now out of the appraiser's control.

Webbed.
 
I meant whatever it was AP sent to the appraiser's client AFTER the appraiser sent the ENV file to AP. Something being transmitted now out of the appraiser's control.

The client gets a PDF made from the ENV. The appraiser can use the ENV tool that FNC posted to see it exactly as the client does. This can be done prior to transmission.

I have tested this by having a client to send me what they got.
 
FNC / APPRAISER FIRESTORM AGAIN ........... Appraisalport User Contract

http://www.workingre.com/workingre/fnc-appraiser-firestorm.html


Neil Olson, Chief Legal Officer for FNC says,

This user agreement is almost the same as the one it replaces. Appraisers may not sign up for or use AppraisalPort without agreeing to the AppraisalPort agreement. When the new agreement becomes effective in September, all AppraisalPort users will then be subject to the new version of the agreement.”

According to Olson, appraisers have it wrong. “AppraisalPort does not convert anything. Lenders use AppraisalPort to transmit requests and appraisers transmit reports back,” Olson said.

“We don’t do anything to a report. What the appraiser sends is what the lender gets. All conversions are done by the appraiser.

Appraisers are responsible for making sure the report they send is complete when they send it.


Whatever appraisers give us is what is handed over to the lender.”


ya know what Mike........The absolute temerity of all their intellectual psycho babble and legal jargon.. Let Olsens Appraisal PORT down load this to their musical chair repitoire......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QY5mooPJbY

BOOM! BOOM!
 
Last edited:
The client gets a PDF made from the ENV. The appraiser can use the ENV tool that FNC posted to see it exactly as the client does. This can be done prior to transmission.

I have tested this by having a client to send me what they got.


If the client ends up with a PDF made for the ENV file, why not just have the appraiser send the PDF in the first place so that all these conversions are not necessary?
 
Since the ENV file with the AIReady version of the report is created by the appraiser, not by AP, I don't think they are too concerened about it.


I wanted to know what anybody thinks about notifying and useing a hold harmless with the client. I say this because the client is the one insisting on use of the conversion software. If they dont care , then I should not care either with a handy dandy hold harmless signed by client.

If there is no problem, then what worry do they have?
 
If the client ends up with a PDF made for the ENV file, why not just have the appraiser send the PDF in the first place so that all these conversions are not necessary?

Aye, matey.........

I love to dance...but this dance is getting old and wearisome.

FACT: E & O Companies (with the exception of Mr. Wileys) are saying DON'T AGREE

FACT: Most of the various attorneys consulted (with the exception of Mr. Wileys) are saying DON'T AGREE.

FACT: The FNC agreement will put you at risk for any kind of legal action whether you actually had a part in it, knew about it, used AIReady - or didn't. YOU take all the risk - and YOU get none of the reward.

FACT: It would be sheer insanity to agree to such terms.

FACT: NO insurance will cover you for this onerous and agregious one-sided agreement.

One has to wonder just WHY it is that such a one-sided, heavy handed agreement was felt necessary by FNC. If they are not converting or otherwise intruding on reports, what are they so worried about? Why are they going to such great lengths to cover their corporate behinds while leaving appraisers to hang in the wind?

Mateys.............the port is DEFINITELY full of rats and it is time to aim the cannon, full bore. Hint..........talk to the LENDERS. They don't like risk without reward, either. Someone is trying to convince us that up is down and down is up...........foul, foul, poisoned water.....drink it at your own peril. And why? The rum is NOT gone..............

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pmXLjtSEHQ
 
Aye, matey.........

I love to dance...but this dance is getting old and wearisome.

FACT: E & O Companies (with the exception of Mr. Wileys) are saying DON'T AGREE

FACT: Most of the various attorneys consulted (with the exception of Mr. Wileys) are saying DON'T AGREE.

FACT: The FNC agreement will put you at risk for any kind of legal action whether you actually had a part in it, knew about it, used AIReady - or didn't. YOU take all the risk - and YOU get none of the reward.

FACT: It would be sheer insanity to agree to such terms.

FACT: NO insurance will cover you for this onerous and agregious one-sided agreement.

One has to wonder just WHY it is that such a one-sided, heavy handed agreement was felt necessary by FNC. If they are not converting or otherwise intruding on reports, what are they so worried about? Why are they going to such great lengths to cover their corporate behinds while leaving appraisers to hang in the wind?

Mateys.............the port is DEFINITELY full of rats and it is time to aim the cannon, full bore. Hint..........talk to the LENDERS. They don't like risk without reward, either. Someone is trying to convince us that up is down and down is up...........foul, foul, poisoned water.....drink it at your own peril. And why? The rum is NOT gone..............

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pmXLjtSEHQ

You go girl:clapping:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top