If I was a regulator reading these comments I would mobilize the appraisal posse. “What are your standard, peer adjustments for xxxx?” Are you kidding me? Do you put in your work file, “Wxxx from AF uses $4,000 for a bath adjustment.”?
I can see some appraisers don’t do a lot of high-end properties. Remember from appraising 101, for the sales comparison approach, think like the buyer/seller. What is going to drive your asking price/offer price? Without knowing your market, I can say in general for high-end properties, look at location, size and quality of construction. For amenities, look only at the big ticket items. For a 10,000 sqft. 15 room, 6 bedroom, 4.3 bath home you want to make an offer on, are you really going to adjust your price based upon a half bath difference with a comp? Are you really going to adjust your price on the number of decks or fireplaces? I would say no. So why are you making adjustments for those items? All you are doing is showing that you used POA for support.
Same for lot size. Buyers really don’t care for lot size differences except for very large differences. They are looking at quality of landscaping/view/location when comparing properties. You lose me at “$25/sqft adjustment difference”. Show me the receipt! For GLA, can you really show a supportable difference in value between a 10,300 sqft house and a 11,800 sqft house? I bet if a buyer walked through both houses without knowing the GLA they would not even be able to tell you which one was bigger, let alone tell you how much their offer will change.
For a good appraisal for a high-end property, I want to see 3 things; 1. Comps that are comparable in location, quality, significant amenities (pool, tennis court, multi-car garages, etc.). 2. Adjustments only for those of #1. 3. Extensive explanation not only of any adjustments but why you chose your comps. Your adjusted sales prices for 3 comps will not be a $2,000 range. You will have to support your opinion of value with the large dollar ASP range by explaining the strengths and weaknesses of the comps and reconcile.