BarrySW1963
Member
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2010
- Professional Status
- Appraiser Trainee
- State
- Texas
So, I understand that when the zoning maps in our area mark something as a PUD (in lieu of a zoning classification), that it is actually a PUD, and the rules for the lot sizes, house sizes, set backs, etc. are determined by what the developer(s) of that PUD negotiated with the city, in lieu of zoning (i.e. these parcels aren't zoned, but their development is still subject to tight rules, and those rules are found in the PUD filings with the city's development office). In these cases, the houses are subject to mandatory membership HOAs, with mandatory membership dues/fees. Do you mark this as "PUD" for the zoning on pg. 1 of the URAR? (PUD fees are marked on pg. 1 of the URAR.)
We also have developments that have formal zoning classifications where larger parcels were subdivided and developed en mass, that also have mandatory-membership HOAs. In this case, on the URAR, the zoning is marked per what the city maps have the parcel zoned as (i.e. SF1, SF2, etc.) instead of "PUD", with additional data in the description field for the zoning (i.e., "7,000 sf minimum lot with 1,600 sf minimum dwelling, etc.). These are also considered to be PUDs, but subject to zoning regulations as well as whatever rules the developer negotiated with the city for the development. (PUD fees are marked on pg. 1 of the URAR, same as the first case.)
So, how would you handle parcels where this happens: a larger multi-acre parcel is divided into several dozen or a hundred lots, and the development of these lots is controlled by CC&Rs, or deed restrictions. In these instances, the new, smaller parcels aren't zoned, and the lots aren't subject to mandatory-memberhip HOAs. Homes are then stick-built by individual (custom, semi-custom, "build on your own lot", etc.) builders and not by mass developers. What individuals can do with the lots is completely controlled by the deed restrictions. Would you also call this a PUD?
We also have developments that have formal zoning classifications where larger parcels were subdivided and developed en mass, that also have mandatory-membership HOAs. In this case, on the URAR, the zoning is marked per what the city maps have the parcel zoned as (i.e. SF1, SF2, etc.) instead of "PUD", with additional data in the description field for the zoning (i.e., "7,000 sf minimum lot with 1,600 sf minimum dwelling, etc.). These are also considered to be PUDs, but subject to zoning regulations as well as whatever rules the developer negotiated with the city for the development. (PUD fees are marked on pg. 1 of the URAR, same as the first case.)
So, how would you handle parcels where this happens: a larger multi-acre parcel is divided into several dozen or a hundred lots, and the development of these lots is controlled by CC&Rs, or deed restrictions. In these instances, the new, smaller parcels aren't zoned, and the lots aren't subject to mandatory-memberhip HOAs. Homes are then stick-built by individual (custom, semi-custom, "build on your own lot", etc.) builders and not by mass developers. What individuals can do with the lots is completely controlled by the deed restrictions. Would you also call this a PUD?