- Joined
- Jan 15, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- California
Ask away. The forum is supposed to be about such exchanges of info.
Believe it or not the changes in cap rates tend to lag the changes in mortgage interest rates. Aside from that the overall rate is only partly comprised of the mortgage end; the equity end of the investment has it's own rate which will reflect the investor expectations for changes to both income and resale value going forward. If the mortgage rate is 8% and the financing terms are for a 70% LTV then .08 x .7 = .0560. Anything above that goes to offset the investor's end and anything under that isn't debt servicing without the investor coming out of pocket.
If the investors think a market segment is going to increase in value over the next couple years or if they think the rents will increase then that will explain why they might run with negative cash flow. For a while. The flip side of that is that comm loans commonly get rewritten every 5 years or 10 yr intervals. So interest rates from 2019 might not be available anymore, which when combined with any weakness in the occupancy or rents is enough to push some of these properties into a forced transaction. And/or foreclosure or short sale.
Experienced investors are all about the dollars and cents with not a whole lot of sentimentality involved. But they don't always do what we expect them to do. The recent changes to office and retail occupancy has been taking it's toll on the pricing for such property types. Regardless of the occupancy, the fixed overhead continues. If a building is maxed on financing and might needs 75% or 80% occupancy to cover the expenses and mortgage. If the occupancy drops below that or the rents drop then it doesn't take very long before the loan fails.
Believe it or not the changes in cap rates tend to lag the changes in mortgage interest rates. Aside from that the overall rate is only partly comprised of the mortgage end; the equity end of the investment has it's own rate which will reflect the investor expectations for changes to both income and resale value going forward. If the mortgage rate is 8% and the financing terms are for a 70% LTV then .08 x .7 = .0560. Anything above that goes to offset the investor's end and anything under that isn't debt servicing without the investor coming out of pocket.
If the investors think a market segment is going to increase in value over the next couple years or if they think the rents will increase then that will explain why they might run with negative cash flow. For a while. The flip side of that is that comm loans commonly get rewritten every 5 years or 10 yr intervals. So interest rates from 2019 might not be available anymore, which when combined with any weakness in the occupancy or rents is enough to push some of these properties into a forced transaction. And/or foreclosure or short sale.
Experienced investors are all about the dollars and cents with not a whole lot of sentimentality involved. But they don't always do what we expect them to do. The recent changes to office and retail occupancy has been taking it's toll on the pricing for such property types. Regardless of the occupancy, the fixed overhead continues. If a building is maxed on financing and might needs 75% or 80% occupancy to cover the expenses and mortgage. If the occupancy drops below that or the rents drop then it doesn't take very long before the loan fails.
Last edited: