Joe Flacco
Elite Member
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2013
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Maryland
I imagine nail in the coffin coming soon for the small AMC.
A massive redistribution of wealth from appraiser to bank... if nice perhaps they will even reduce the price of the "appraisal" to the customer. notHow much money is at stake with the expansion of hybrid and bifuricated products? It's gotta be in the billions annually right?
I do not know. I also don’t see it as “at stake.” Hybrids will simply replace some of the existing traditional work. So, from a business standpoint they are not an expansion opportunity for AMCs or appraisers. They are merely a (partial) retention opportunity.How much money is at stake with the expansion of hybrid and bifuricated products? It's gotta be in the billions annually right?
I do not know. I also don’t see it as “at stake.” Hybrids will simply replace some of the existing traditional work. So, from a business standpoint they are not an expansion opportunity for AMCs or appraisers. They are merely a (partial) retention opportunity.
It is my belief that they could eventually replace 25% to 50% of traditional Fannie work, but that is replacement, not true expansiion. For non-Fannie work, they have already been in use for a long time.
I don't think George is the one we need to be sorry for ...Some people just can't help themselves.
I feel bad for George over this.
.
Hybrids, aka the desktop portion with no personal inspection will be the logical use for an appraiser doing far off area assignments , correct? Which is why I had a problem with the poll, I don't think the assumptions set forth ( you don't have to move to area, unlimited time/resources) , with appraisers thinking they would inspect, yielded the same answers than if the poll was based on the probability of what it will be used for ( hybrid/desktop work )
What would people's anwser be to the below:
1) Doing desktop portion, without going to the area or inspecting the property, within a tight turn time and possibly lacking local MLS, do you think you can competently appraise a property in regions/areas or states you have no familiarity with?
2) Do you need to be geo competent to appraise for desktop or hybrid or bifurcated assignments under the conditions of tight turn time and possible lack of local MLS?
The answer to number 1 is clearly NO. But you are introducing variables that are not common (e.g. no access to local MLS).Hybrids, aka the desktop portion with no personal inspection will be the logical use for an appraiser doing far off area assignments , correct? Which is why I had a problem with the poll, I don't think the assumptions set forth ( you don't have to move to area, unlimited time/resources) , with appraisers thinking they would inspect, yielded the same answers than if the poll was based on the probability of what it will be used for ( hybrid/desktop work )
What would people's anwser be to the below:
1) Doing desktop portion, without going to the area or inspecting the property, within a tight turn time and possibly lacking local MLS, do you think you can competently appraise a property in regions/areas or states you have no familiarity with?
2) Do you need to be geo competent to appraise for desktop or hybrid or bifurcated assignments under the conditions of tight turn time and possible lack of local MLS?
I don't think George is the one we need to be sorry for ...