Ter,
You raised an interesting point about geographic concerns for some who must travel for CE or an assoc. meeting. It is true, but...
I am wondering why this is any different from other aspects of life? If you choose to live in a rural community (by choice or family heritage), do you not have to put up with the disadvantages attendant to that in order to get the advantages?
I drive 31.9 miles to work. 1-1.5 hours each way (yep- LA freeways). If I lived in rural AR, I could go that in what, 25-30 minutes? But, I would also not have easy access to lots of other things.
If I were a doctor in your area and wanted to attend an AMA chapter meeting, would I not have to drive a long way? if I were a lawyer and wanted to serve on an ethics committee, would I not be faced with the same thing?
When you make a choice on where you live and work, it all comes into play. Some trade lack of access to museums, restaurants, etc. for clean air and no traffic. Others do not.
So, for your circumstance, professional assoc. membership may not make sense. For others it would. JoAnn Meyer Stratton travels considerable distances to attend her AI and NAIFA chapter meetings. She has made her choice, just as you made yours.
I just think it is unreasonable to require easy access to certain things when you make a conscious decision to live far away from those things. It is just as unreasonable for those who choose to live close to those things to expect freedom from the drawbacks like traffic, smog, and noise.
On CE, eventually, some or all of it will be available on-line. It will be available from both the orgs and the proprietary schools. So, you will get to choose whom you pay. For the proprietary schools, those courses will be developed by a very few people with minimum input from others. For orgs, they have a base of thousands of pros to access. For me, and meaning no disrespect to the for profit schools, I'd rather get my ed from the orgs. Again, it is my choice.
Brad Ellis, IFA, RAA
You raised an interesting point about geographic concerns for some who must travel for CE or an assoc. meeting. It is true, but...
I am wondering why this is any different from other aspects of life? If you choose to live in a rural community (by choice or family heritage), do you not have to put up with the disadvantages attendant to that in order to get the advantages?
I drive 31.9 miles to work. 1-1.5 hours each way (yep- LA freeways). If I lived in rural AR, I could go that in what, 25-30 minutes? But, I would also not have easy access to lots of other things.
If I were a doctor in your area and wanted to attend an AMA chapter meeting, would I not have to drive a long way? if I were a lawyer and wanted to serve on an ethics committee, would I not be faced with the same thing?
When you make a choice on where you live and work, it all comes into play. Some trade lack of access to museums, restaurants, etc. for clean air and no traffic. Others do not.
So, for your circumstance, professional assoc. membership may not make sense. For others it would. JoAnn Meyer Stratton travels considerable distances to attend her AI and NAIFA chapter meetings. She has made her choice, just as you made yours.
I just think it is unreasonable to require easy access to certain things when you make a conscious decision to live far away from those things. It is just as unreasonable for those who choose to live close to those things to expect freedom from the drawbacks like traffic, smog, and noise.
On CE, eventually, some or all of it will be available on-line. It will be available from both the orgs and the proprietary schools. So, you will get to choose whom you pay. For the proprietary schools, those courses will be developed by a very few people with minimum input from others. For orgs, they have a base of thousands of pros to access. For me, and meaning no disrespect to the for profit schools, I'd rather get my ed from the orgs. Again, it is my choice.
Brad Ellis, IFA, RAA