I had always interpreted the question to mean, "Why weren't there some better comparables"? The answer to that could go on for pages and require a week or more of research into the local housing market, to determine why there weren't more sales of that sort of home in the subject neighborhood within the specified time frame.
After reading your posts, I think whoever first framed that question meant to say, "What were the characteristics of the comps you cited that caused you, as an appraiser, to believe they were most indicative of the value of the subject, keeping in mind the restrictions of time, place, etc., that we place on the use of comparables".
Or did they mean something else? :?: . I first heard that statement in about 1985 from a local underwriter who was presiding at a seminar for appraisers. She was very dogmatic and spoke to us in tones as if she were very angry and very irritated. That was my first, and lasting, impression of underwriters.
I had never used, and still haven't used the "best available" statement, anyway, having seen it many times on the reports I was reviewing.
It's funny how a bad phrase, such as "Why were they the best" will through usage over time, take on an aura of authenticity and will become sort of a litenany among certain groups, to be repeated over and over.
By the way, for the questioner. The use of that form supplied by Athena is entirely optional.
Thomas N. Morgan (Florida)
State-Certified Residential Appraiser 0000052
[/i]