Overimprovement
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 31, 2017
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Kentucky
Here is another big issue. We all know interest rates will rise, as will foreclosures. Credit ratings will decrease as well. And we are FAR from done with the effects of COVID, even if no new cases were ever reported. And that is extremely unlikely. The damage done to millions of individuals, small businesses, and even investors that own shopping centers, duplexes, etc is done, and still going on. As banks struggle to get payments on their loans, that is a squeeze on that end. As interest rates rise, (and this WILL happen), there will be less demand for housing, squeezing that side as well.
So banks have less coming in on existing loans, and lower demand for new loans. This will, even more, increase the competition for the loan opportunities that do exist. What happens when banks get overly-competitive? Bad things mostly.
So at a time when it seems almost certain there will be intense competition in banking, and the housing market is arguably as volatile as it has been since the meltdown, Fannie decides it will implement a product which will increase fraud, and lower the credibility of valuations. And we can argue by how much it will lower the overall credibility of the value conclusion, and many have already, but removing the interior inspection just will. It is naive to assume otherwise. So what if losses are only 5% (or insert your own figure) more than they would have been? Who pays that 5%? Every American taxpayer.
Can Fannie do this? Yes, they have some pretty far-reaching abilities apparently. Should they do this? 100% no, IMHO. But alas, I was not given a vote.
So banks have less coming in on existing loans, and lower demand for new loans. This will, even more, increase the competition for the loan opportunities that do exist. What happens when banks get overly-competitive? Bad things mostly.
So at a time when it seems almost certain there will be intense competition in banking, and the housing market is arguably as volatile as it has been since the meltdown, Fannie decides it will implement a product which will increase fraud, and lower the credibility of valuations. And we can argue by how much it will lower the overall credibility of the value conclusion, and many have already, but removing the interior inspection just will. It is naive to assume otherwise. So what if losses are only 5% (or insert your own figure) more than they would have been? Who pays that 5%? Every American taxpayer.
Can Fannie do this? Yes, they have some pretty far-reaching abilities apparently. Should they do this? 100% no, IMHO. But alas, I was not given a vote.