• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Workfile

Whether you mean this or not, "It is in my workfile but I don't want to provide it" is code to reviewers for "I made it up." Summarize the support you have. If you don't have very good support, go to the market and develop the support, then revise your report accordingly. If it changes your opinion, so be it.
Yep. If it's an internal reviewer... that is someone who is reviewing the quality of your work before the appraisal report is passed to the loan officer, you will need to deal with it. If it's a contracted external reviewer who is asking, you can tell them to pound sand. However, if you do, it will eventually get back to the Client which may decide you aren't worth their time. No more assignments from them.

If all you reported was that the supporting documentation is in your workfile, you are not in compliance with USPAP. If you said, for example, 'the adjustment for differences in GLA was derived using paired sales analysis which is retained in my workfile' then, in my opinion... you meet USPAP minimum requirement. Remember though, the level of detail required in an appraisal report is determined by the needs of the Intended User.
 
I am being asked by a review appraiser to further explain an adjustment made in a report. I have replied that the supporting documentation is contained in my workfile and no further explanation is needed. I do not wish to be contentious but would like peer opinions.
Like 99% of review appraisers do not have geographic competency. You are being asked because some computer program that they use did not agree with your adjustment. Telling them to pound sand is correct thing to do, especially if you extracted your adjustment from comps not on the grid.
 
Whether you mean this or not, "It is in my workfile but I don't want to provide it" is code to reviewers for "I made it up." Summarize the support you have. If you don't have very good support, go to the market and develop the support, then revise your report accordingly. If it changes your opinion, so be it.
Its not code for anything. You do understand that you can extract adjustments from comps not used on the grid? Or you just did an appraisal in the area and the adjustments that you used can be used again???? I swear even on this site people are short sighted and believe everything that the AMC lords say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cob
SR 2-2 (a) (vii): “Summarize the scope of work used to develop the appraisal.” Sufficient information includes disclosure of research and analyses performed and might also include disclosure of research and analyses not performed. While you determine the scope of work, your client should be in agreement with it. (See Importance of a Good Scope of Work).

SR 2-2 (a) (viii): “Summarize the information analyzed, the appraisal methods and techniques employed, and the reasoning that supports the analyses, opinions, and conclusion
 
Like 99% of review appraisers do not have geographic competency. You are being asked because some computer program that they use did not agree with your adjustment. Telling them to pound sand is correct thing to do, especially if you extracted your adjustment from comps not on the grid.
The reviewer's request... as stated... does not require geographic compentence. The reviewer said that the appraisal report contains insufficient support for the adjustment. That doesn't require any geographic knowledge. Not saying that I agree with the reviewer's request... I'd need to review the appraisal report myself to have an opinion about that.

Review is subject to Scope or Work just like Appraisal is. Some reviews do not require the reviewer to deliver their own opinion of value. They don't need to understand the market in the subject's geographic area. They don't need to have access to sales data from the area. What they need is to be thoroughly grounded in Standards and in appraisal methodology.
 
It also depends on who the reviewer it. My main lender has staff reviewers who have access to CU. CU is a lot more than printing out a report card on you. It has different layers that show many things that we don't see. If you have a bad CU score, the lender may want to know why, maybe you did something wrong, can correct it. Or prove you are smarter than CU, which you can. The other issue that comes out is that your adjust did not match the group thought. CU is based on appraiser group thought, not you oddball adjustment. So you prove you are right.

I talked to some reivewers who explained CU to me, i was amazed at the info they had. Stupid is fannie not sharing this with us.
 
The reviewer's request... as stated... does not require geographic compentence. The reviewer said that the appraisal report contains insufficient support for the adjustment. That doesn't require any geographic knowledge. Not saying that I agree with the reviewer's request... I'd need to review the appraisal report myself to have an opinion about that.

Review is subject to Scope or Work just like Appraisal is. Some reviews do not require the reviewer to deliver their own opinion of value. They don't need to understand the market in the subject's geographic area. They don't need to have access to sales data from the area. What they need is to be thoroughly grounded in Standards and in appraisal methodology.

How would a reviewer know the "report contains insufficient support for the adjustment", say you did a detailed data review for an in ground pool adjustment, you used 3 or 4 paired sales and determined that the in ground pool adjustment should be $45,000, the reviewer comes back and states that the "report contains insufficient support for the adjustment" how would they know that, they would 100% have to have geographic knowledge to state there was insufficient data for the adjustment, the problem is, to many times these requests for and explanation for adjustments are to vague, there is no, you made a $45,000 adjustment for an in ground pool and we don't agree with it because of, X, Y, Z, it's always, we don't agree with it and want you to explain it to us.

The appraisal reports that most appraisers complete for GSE work, are not supposed to explain in great detail EVERY adjustment that is made, as Mr. Shields already posted.

SR 2-2 (a) (viii): “Summarize the information analyzed, the appraisal methods and techniques employed, and the reasoning that supports the analyses, opinions, and conclusion.

The problem these days is that appraisers are not able, by a LOT of lenders and AMC's to Summarize the information, methods and techniques employed, reasoning that supports the analyses, opinions, and conclusion, they are expected to explain EVERY detail for EVERY adjustment, "Comp 1 and 2 were adjusted for gross living area, using paired sales (from 14 other possible comparable sales considered) and 123 Main Street was compared to 123 Maple Street" "Comp 3 and 4 were adjusted garage count using paired sales (from 14 other possible comparable sales considered) and 123 Manor Street was compared to 123 Congress Street" this is the reason I am slowly fazing my way out of doing GSE appraisal assignments, once all of these changes that are coming at the end of 2025 and early 2026 come, I will be completely done with any GSE work.
 
Last edited:
It also depends on who the reviewer it. My main lender has staff reviewers who have access to CU. CU is a lot more than printing out a report card on you. It has different layers that show many things that we don't see. If you have a bad CU score, the lender may want to know why, maybe you did something wrong, can correct it. Or prove you are smarter than CU, which you can. The other issue that comes out is that your adjust did not match the group thought. CU is based on appraiser group thought, not you oddball adjustment. So you prove you are right.

I talked to some reivewers who explained CU to me, i was amazed at the info they had. Stupid is fannie not sharing this with us.
Why share it with those they want to eliminate?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cob
Regarding his MAGA faithful....
Trump only has to worry about what he doesn't do....
Not what he does do....
Even if what he does do hurts his supporters....
They'll still vote for Trump's 3rd term....



 
Regarding his MAGA faithful....
Trump only has to worry about what he doesn't do....
Not what he does do....
Even if what he does do hurts his supporters....
They'll still vote for Trump's 3rd term....

Maybe time for another AF timeout there bud
 
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top