- Joined
- Jan 15, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- California
One problem a residential appraiser might run into with HBU analysis is if they don't have access to non-residential databases.
doesn't even mention HBU, does it? Don't make this too hard..it isn't.one to four unit residential properties without regard to value or complexity; and,
Subpart G, Appraisals under 225.63 adopted by the board of Governors of the Federal Reserve system June 27, 1990..."A regulated institution may presume that appraisals for 1-to-4 family residential properties are not complex unless the institution has readily available information that a given appraisal will be complex. The regulated institution will be responsible for making the final determination of whether the appraisal is complex...."
One problem a residential appraiser might run into with HBU analysis is if they don't have access to non-residential databases.
I don't see any problem for a Residential Appraiser doing either one of them. On a) ten acres is a residential tract and is not feasible as an ag economic unit. It's an estate sized tract, not a farm. A lot of people in situations like this fight conversion to Residential Zoning because their taxes skyrocket. If they can keep a horse or a cow or a rooster on it, they can claim "ag" status and defeat any attempt to change the zoning to residential.Who can/should appraise these types of properties?
a)A rural property used residential on 10+ acres zoned Agricultural (no Ag use present)
b) An urban property used residential zoned commercial.
Review it.To reviewers out there, CG or not, what do you do when something like this comes across your desk as a residential appraisal?
I don't see any problem for a Residential Appraiser doing either one of them. On a) ten acres is a residential tract and is not feasible as an ag economic unit. It's an estate sized tract, not a farm. A lot of people in situations like this fight conversion to Residential Zoning because their taxes skyrocket. If they can keep a horse or a cow or a rooster on it, they can claim "ag" status and defeat any attempt to change the zoning to residential.
On b), if there is a potential change in use then it MAY escalate to a commercial appraisal, but so long as it is being marketed as a residential property and is being used as a residential property then it IS a residential property. You can "what if" any property to death, but you are dealing with what is, not what it might be at some point in the future. It is entirely possible for the house to be appraised this week as a house, then in 3 months appraised as a an outlying plot at the newest super wal-mart. Although the outlyer lot should be done by a CG, the house as a house is residential as of the effective date of the appraisal.
Review it.
Am I gonna fault you for not anticipating that the house was going to be moved off the tract and a new Applebee's was going in? Not likely. What is your scope of work? Are the results you developed within that scope of work credible? Did you minimize your assumptions? Did you explain where and how you made assumptions? Are they reasonable (and thus credible)?
If you try to persuade me that the Ag land is a farm, you better have evidence beyond what the zoning says. I know a place where you can get 160 acres for under $15,000 ($1,500 down, owner carry the balance). Does that make it a farm? nope. Not only that, you can't even build a house on it unless you put in a cistern for your water. There isn't enough dirt OR water to grow a peanut, let alone farm. FWIW, it too, is zoned ag and it take around 200 acres per AU.
The subject is zoned commercial but HBU is considered as improved, as used, as comparable sales zoned commercial sold and used as residential are available and competitive in the residential market, but not in the commercial market, as recent sales this neighborhood of commercially zoned rowhouses improved and used as residences are listed as both commercial and residential for the market, but are predominantly bought/sold as residences." (Sorry about the run on sentence...of the cuff)
Of course it did. SFR and MFR are HBU designations. One-to-four unit specifies an intensity of development and residential is a category of design – and those are the two dimensions (highest and best) of use. A fifth unit would exceed the intensity limit and a different permissible use would exceed the category limit.one to four unit residential propertiesdoesn't even mention HBU
Of course it did. SFR and MFR are HBU designations. One-to-four unit specifies an intensity of development and residential is a category of design – and those are the two dimensions (highest and best) of use. A fifth unit would exceed the intensity limit and a different permissible use would exceed the category limit.one to four unit residential propertiesdoesn't even mention HBU
I agree. It’s very simple. Commercial property isn’t residential and inept word games won’t change that.Don't make this too hard..it isn't.
If you can’t make a sound appraisal argument, then stop breaking the rules with personal insults.I don't play the SS parsing game. We can play word games all day