Virgina REAB and Portal Petition

[Pamela Crowley (Florida)]

Oh, good. Looks like we might finally have some real disclosure starting.

 

[Don Clark]

You read my mind.

Oops, I better behave. I wouldn't want to upset anyone. Might get another email. :icon_neutral:

Given the personal tirade previously spewed at DW by a certain party, I find the inference that anyone perceiving a possible conflict of interest by other parties is "slandering" those parties to be laughable.

Uh oh, now I am really in for it. :icon_rolleyes:

And why cannot one respect both Mr. Turner and Mr. Wiley, even if they have opposing views?

That is a big problem in our country right now. If one has an opposing view, it becomes almost a requirement that one with an opposite view hate the other. I just don't see it that way. I have met, know and respect both men. They are presenting their ideas and opinions. I respect that as well. i may have differing opinions from each of them from time to time but that is not out of a lack of respect, just that I may have a different opinion.

But, Mr. Turner is a member of the Virginia real estate Appraisal Board. If the board adopts his view and opinion, then I am bound to comply with what the board decides. That is a fact, respect for the individual(s) aside.

What i do not understand is, where is Fannie mae in all of this?

I attended a "Train the trainer" session in New Orleans in 2005 and Joe Minnich of Fannie Mae made it very clear......you and I, and presumably no one else can change the "Mew"(2005 series) of forms....period. The one concession made to date, as far as I know, is rewording of Certification #23. It was also stated that any modification, deletion, or change in the intent and purpose of the new forms would be viewed by fannie Mae as a misleading appraisal report. If that be true, then where in the hell is Fannie Mae and the other contributors to the revamp of the forms in all of this? The fact that Fannie Mae allows the use of a portal that does alter and change the forms would then make a lie of their contention as stated to well over 50 instructors in that event, and even more in subsequent training sessions.

Some one want to call Joe and ask hime? his number is 1-202-752-5566

 

[Pamela Crowley (Florida)]

I'm most interested in what the ultimate Wall Street investors and the courts will have to say about all of this.

 

[Fred]

I'm most interested in what the ultimate Wall Street investors and the courts will have to say about all of this.

About all of what?

Mis-information is abound from some on both sides of the arguement. As the ASB and the AI have both failed to do anything, if nothing more than allow these things to happen, a state has decided to take on the issue directly.

What things?

 

[DWiley]

For anyone else on this thread to raise questions about zzz XXXXXX's involvement as part of the Board is simply someone trying to slander a good person's name.

My dictionary (Webster's New Collegiuate) defines slander as

The utterance of false charges or misrepresentation which defame and damage another's reputaion.

Can someone explain what is false about the claim that that leading a committee investigating an entity that one is suing is a conflict of interest?

 

[Joyce Potts]

My dictionary (Webster's New Collegiuate) defines slander as



Can someone explain what is false about the claim that that leading a committee investigating an entity that one is suing is a conflict of interest?

Ironic, coming from someone who served and chaired the ASB, yet also a paid ZAIO consultant. You know, inspection vs. effective date and all that jazz?

For crying out loud, the VA thing is not just about FNC, it's about ALL the management companies.

If FNC has chosen to personalize the argument, that's their problem.

Is it not true that Mr. Chapin of Zaio also attended a Virginia Board Meeting and openly stated that he was aware of companies using AI Ready software, opening reports and manipulating the data and the results?

Gosh Danny, if Mr. Turner has in-depth knowledge of the issues-- but because of a side bar lawsuit involving only ONE particular company, he's supposed to step down and shut up?

This is flat out NOT about FNC, but thanks for playing the game.

 

[DWiley]

What i do not understand is, where is Fannie mae in all of this?

I think Fannie weighed in on the issue when they began requiring AIReady for certain assignments. What is it about AIReady conversion that you think is contrary to Fannie's position about the forms?

I have posted parts of forms, including the certification. What do you see that is unacceptable?

 

[DWiley]

Ironic coming from someone who served and chaired the ASB, and also a paid ZAIO consultant.

I did not do those things at the same time . THAT would have been a conflict.

The irony is that some of those who want to hang me are willing to so easily look the other way now. Fans of Machiavelli, I assume.

 

[Joyce Potts]

I did not do those things at the same time . THAT would have been a conflict.

The irony is that some of those who want to hang me are willing to so easily look the other way now. Fans of Machiavelli, I assume.

Ok--when you served on the ASB did you ever participate in discussions involving effective vs. inspection dates?

 

[Ken B]

So, what is your opinion of RIMS?

Ironic, coming from someone who served and chaired the ASB, yet also a paid ZAIO consultant. You know, inspection vs. effective date and all that jazz?

For crying out loud, the VA thing is not just about FNC, it's about ALL the management companies.

If FNC has chosen to personalize the argument, that's their problem.

Is it not true that Mr. Chapin of Zaio also attended a Virginia Board Meeting and openly stated that he was aware of companies using AI Ready software, opening reports and manipulating the data and the results?

Gosh Danny, if Mr. Turner has in-depth knowledge of the issues-- but because of a side bar lawsuit involving only ONE particular company, he's supposed to step down and shut up?

This is flat out NOT about FNC, but thanks for playing the game.