Virgina REAB and Portal Petition

[Ken B]

Too much time on your hands?

Isn't that a Styx song? Never really cared for it or them.

 

[Bearslide]

Log in and you will get the message.

Thank you and you are correct - I just checked it.

It appears sometimes the squeeky wheels get oiled.

It would be interesting, now that it can be done, to see an actual report (with confidential data removed, of course) that was submitted AIReady.

The question of re-arrangement of data is still a concern.

 

[Ken B]

Ok, Mr. Santora, out with it. Either discuss your defamatory comments with me OR with Mr. Lanigan.

The choice is yours.

If this is about the Lehman suit--again $0 judgement. That said, other than being a principle partner in the firm with my name on it, I had absolutely NOTHING to do with those appraisals, nor was I ever required to testify in either a deposition or at the trial.

I think you owe me and this Forum further explanation.

Well, since you brought it up...didn't you have to sign the form in order to be your son's registered supervisor? Despite the fact that he was "in school full-time in Tallahassee" and "you didn't want him to be an appraiser."

Tallahassee isn't exactly located in a county contiguous to Orange County, is it? Doesn't Florida law require Trainees to be located in the supervising appraiser's county or a county contiguous to it?

Why wouldn't a trainee who wasn't actively appraising remain in inactive status?

Oh shucks, someone must be quite upset with me now. I really must stop being so impetuous.

 

[DWiley]

The question of re-arrangement of data is still a concern.

I understand that concern. Just as the appraiser is responsible for knowing how the software works, so is a client that is requesting its use. Anyone using AIReady should know that it may relocate long comments to an addendum.

Carnivore,

That attorney did call, but I could not take the assignment because it involved a client of mine. I know better than to get involved in litigation involving a company I have some other relationship with. :icon_lol:

Thanks for thinking about me, and good luck with it!! I recommended a well qualified person who I think would do a great job with it.

DW

 

[Fred]

I want to know the meaning and basis for that comment.

The meaning of it seems ironic, is it seems ironic. I am not trying to say you inflate appraisals. I don't think people who post here do.

The basis is you finding irony in someone else's work as a USPAP expert. Well, his name is on the document as an author. As far as I know, you haven't published anything on inflated appraisals, and yet they picked you to go on TV. So, however much irony there is in the former, that is a lot more in the latter.

 

[Pamela Crowley (Florida)]

Well, since you brought it up...didn't you have to sign the form in order to be your son's registered supervisor? Despite the fact that he was "in school full-time in Tallahassee" and "you didn't want him to be an appraiser."

Tallahassee isn't exactly located in a county contiguous to Orange County, is it? Doesn't Florida law require Trainees to be located in the supervising appraiser's county or a county contiguous to it?

Why wouldn't a trainee who wasn't actively appraising remain in inactive status?

Oh shucks, someone must be quite upset with me now. I really must stop being so impetuous.

Gee, shucks... what makes you think the FREAB online is up to date???

 

[Joyce Potts]

Well, since you brought it up...didn't you have to sign the form in order to be your son's registered supervisor? Despite the fact that he was "in school full-time in Tallahassee" and "you didn't want him to be an appraiser."

Tallahassee isn't exactly located in a county contiguous to Orange County, is it? Doesn't Florida law require Trainees to be located in the supervising appraiser's county or a county contiguous to it?

Why wouldn't a trainee who wasn't actively appraising remain in inactive status?

Oh shucks, someone must be quite upset with me now. I really must stop being so impetuous.

You poor thing. I'm so sorry your business is so slow that you spent your time policing the state websites. I'm not in the least upset with you. Why I thank you for bringing that to my attention.

That said, does it really matter if he's not actively appraising, but may at sometime during holidays or breaks? If I have the legal number of trainees under my name and he attends school in another part of the State, is that really a violation or did I miss the statute requiring the submission of appraisal activity to warrant an active license?

Knowing that you care gives me a warm fuzzy.

Oh, BTW - you can go to www.scpafl.org and look up the tax information about the properties I own just in Seminole County. But for some reason, something tells me you've already done it. I'm flattered by your attention and sincere concerns, Ken.

 

[Workbox]

I know most of you may find this very hard to believe, but I'm not a very easy person to work for <snicker>. Feel free to ask any of them as many come on this Forum from time to time.

Yes, it's true, even I start crying and ball up in fetal position after I hang up with her. :new_all_coholic: I would work for free to learn from her.

 

[Ken B]

I wonder if that appraiser in North Carolina who was "supervising" trainees in FL owned property in FL?

 

[Joyce Potts]

The meaning of it seems ironic, is it seems ironic. I am not trying to say you inflate appraisals. I don't think people who post here do.

The basis is you finding irony in someone else's work as a USPAP expert. Well, his name is on the document as an author. As far as I know, you haven't published anything on inflated appraisals, and yet they picked you to go on TV. However, much irony there is in the former, that is a lot more in the latter.

Gosh Steve, the meaning and inference was crystal clear not only to me but to mulitple others who either called or PM'd me about your post.

I never said I found irony in Danny's work as a USPAP expert. The irony was in the dual affiliations and the suggested conflict of interest that he likens to Mr. Turner.

Perhaps you consider Danny a USPAP expert, but I don't. I served on city code and planning boards for 18 years, but that doesn't make me expert on future land use, city codes or condemnation? Of course it doesn't. Does it perhaps afford me a little more knowledge than the average person? Maybe, maybe not.

Does being in real estate for 32 years and appraising 25 make me an expert? I guess that depends on who you ask. The compensation I've been paid over the years for expert witness testimony may suggest so. The number and variety of appraisals I've done over the years may suggest so. Then again, many of us, much like yourself, know all about the expert witness and appraisal game, don't we?

Nor am I aware that one has to have something 'published' to be considered an expert. They didn't PICK me to go on TV, I volunteered. I found the property, the deal and the fraud and I took it to them. I chose them and they agreed to air it. That doesn't make me an expert, nor was I promoted or described as such.

Your response was lame Steve. Very lame. But I can appreciate your dancing as fast as you can for the sake of damage control.