Meandering
Elite Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2006
- Professional Status
- Real Estate Agent or Broker
- State
- Pennsylvania
I read the words and I do not see what you imply.
The speculation was underlined in Red if that helps you any.
I read the words and I do not see what you imply.
What you underlined, the statement that Fannie has not yet set the SOW or reporting, that is just a fact. No speculation involvedThe speculation was underlined in Red if that helps you any.
Danny, facts don't matter here at the AF, lolWhat you underlined, the statement that Fannie has not yet set the SOW or reporting, that is just a fact. No speculation involved
LOL. And yet again, where is the singular voice of input from the appraisal trade association, that represents a critical mass of individual appraisers in the profession? ...chirp, chirp, chirp... I mean, don't ya think, just maybe, if the largest player who influences the use of appraisals decided to do some experimenting and modernization of appraisals, that it might, just maybe, want to receive some consult from appraisers as a whole? I'm sure appraisers would love to have a say in it (or would they?). Too bad FNMA doesn't really have that resource to draw from. Hard to be mad at them when the option isn't even there.
...and the broken record goes on...until appraisers organize into a single voice, their fates will continue to be dictated to them by the lender clients. Look in the mirror for the problem folks.
And there are undoubtedly appraisers who are even more profitable at high fees while also producing shoddy workWhat's going on is there are appraisers that are profitable at low fees because they do shoddy work. And then clients and AMCs can't tell because they assume standard 1 compliance. At that point all licenses are equal.
And there are undoubtedly appraisers who are even more profitable at high fees while also producing shoddy work