• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

When is a Review Required to meet Std 3?

Status
Not open for further replies.
People get expensive tickets for speeding just over the limit, because society dictates that is necessary to get conformance to the law which in turn makes the highways safer.
Some might say that, at least part of the justification for exorbitant fines, is the need for additional tax revenue. And you're right - we live in the realm of 'opinion' (however well supported), not fact. :)
 
This thread proves why most should not be reviewers. !!!
 
I did a residential appraisal on a 1004 of a high-end home in my market of Central Florida before Christmas directly for an out-of-state lender (no AMC) for an SBA loan. A day after submitting the report I get an e-mail from an appraiser who also holds the SRA and AI-RRS designations, out of South Carolina who informs me that she was retained by the lender to do a review of my report and in an effort to bring it up to USPAP and lender compliancy, my report required multiple revisions.

There were two typos, my fault, my bad, no problem. She wanted the signed engagement letter included in my report and verbiage added that is required on all SBA loans. No problem.

The above issues certainly fall under 'housekeeping' or what many refer to as a 'technical' review with, but she went on to note the following:

A- Remove verbiage addressing that many homes in this market that were purchased back during the bubble / bust years have still not recovered some of the higher prices paid. In support, I included the subject's MLS listing and sale history that was a perfect example. She claimed that what happened back eight+ years ago is not relevant and told me to remove it.

B- Disagreed with my Cost Approach of site contributions of $55,000. And yes, I included support for my estimated vacant site value via allocation.

C- Disagreed with my commentary in support of how the adjustments were supported in terms of paired / matched sales and/or sensitivity analysis because I failed to show the specific analysis to support the methods I used.

This review was done in e-mail format with numbered paragraphs, no limiting conditions, certifications or other Std 3 review compliancy.

I know my feelings on this subject, but am looking for a discussion as to what point a 'technical' review steps into a Std 3 catagory and was the reviewer non-USPAP compliant?

Because this reviewer is not in Florida, she and/or the lender can turn me into the State, but where's my recourse?

And lastly, and the most ironic, when I got her supervisor or the chief MAI appraiser for this lender involved, he told me not to bother with the revisions because for the sake of time and expediency, they approved the appraisal and the loan. So in writing, did he indicate they made a loan on a non-USPAP compliant appraisal?
You didn't say what USPAP violations were alleged. Nothing you listed would be a USPAP violation. I'm betting that means there weren't any. It's common practice for AMCs and Lenders to have compliance, consistency, and QA reviews done. The SoW for those isn't Std 3. In my opinion, trying to get you to change the site value crossed the line. It would be appropriate for them to question your support.. maybe ask for clarification.
 
You didn't say what USPAP violations were alleged. Nothing you listed would be a USPAP violation. I'm betting that means there weren't any. It's common practice for AMCs and Lenders to have compliance, consistency, and QA reviews done. The SoW for those isn't Std 3. In my opinion, trying to get you to change the site value crossed the line. It would be appropriate for them to question your support.. maybe ask for clarification.

That assignment is long over with and I chief MAI reviewer trumped the pathetic reviewer out of South Carolina and he accepted my report without a single change after multiple e-mail exchanges.
 
The gulf between the administrative review and the technical review is an ocean of unknowable depth...
 
Fo
The gulf between the administrative review and the technical review is an ocean of unknowable depth...

Many have been very successful at muddying the waters, but a few like myself, have no problem make a clear distinction when a certified appraiser acting as a reviewer has crossed over in the STD 3/4 realm.
 
That assignment is long over with and I chief MAI reviewer trumped the pathetic reviewer out of South Carolina and he accepted my report without a single change after multiple e-mail exchanges.
And were the phone calls STD 3/4 compliant? :rof:
 
Yup,
it's still appraisal practice, by a licensed appraiser, hired because they are a licensed appraiser.

may not be applicable to Mungo in Mumbia, but when licensed here, there is no pass.

.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top