Huds_Harm
Member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2021
- Professional Status
- General Public
- State
- Texas
I want to be made whole as in whatever was REQUIRED to be done if the appraiser was a competent one. Myself, my realtor nor my home inspector determine minimum property requirements so there is no due diligence there. There were two options that would have been available at the time of purchase.Lets assume the appraiser sucks- it doesnt change the outcome as its a done deal. So now we are entering civil law where one has to prove the damages in a court of law. The $100K seems like a high bar but you will need multipe parties named in the law suite, normally Sellers, Realtors, Appraiser, "your-self" and what due diligence did you do ? and what did you know before the purchase ?
If you were in California I could refer you to a good real estate attorney but her first step and question is how did you suffer $100K in damages ? Where it gets problematic is until one goes to sell a property its hard to measure a $$$ loss. WHAT DO YO WANT ? or is this just a rant about a "bad Appraiser and a Bad Buyer![]()
1. The seller would have been required to pay to update the system.
or
2. Purchase a different home and have two 1/2 years of equity today.
Let me know how you calculate 2 years of intentional refusal to order a field review to determine the property did not qualify and throw in the difference in home prices on top of interest rate hikes from 2021-2023.
Last edited: