Because it produces prices that do not always correlate to MV and it is misleading to buyers.The simplicity is a given. The point is, if that's the way the MARKET works, why dismiss it entirely?
As far as I know, NAR is not against Waivers -When there's a waiver, does it go through AVM and spits out a value. Thus agents have no influence and they don't like that.
Or Waivers mean no appraisals and just based on income and LTV?
Don't understand why NAR would be against Waivers.
I don't trust the internet. I can't get answers that I'm looking for.As far as I know, NAR is not against Waivers -
There is a thing called the INTERNET.
You can find out where the value for a waiver comes from by typing the word appraisal WAIVER in a keyword search ,
The summary search : the value of the property in a waiver is the sale contract price in a purchase appraisal, and in a refinance it is whatever value the lender estimates - as long as in both case, the value fell within an AVM range run by Fannie or Freddie,
Well they are not exactly in favor of themAs far as I know, NAR is not against Waivers -
So far what we have are some appraiser anecdotes that they are common and are overvalued (not undervalued); and we have Freddie saying they're coming in slightly lower than appraisals.Everybody screaming about waivers inflating prices but have little or no proof. How about during the most recent boom. How many offer 5,10,15% above list did you see. How many appraisals did you do with appraisal gap coverage and how many of those came in below contract and the borrower brought 5,10,15% cash to cover the "appraisal gap". Those type of sales were more common than not in many of my areas. How did you treat those sales?
Maybe some markets it works that way or close to it, not in my markets, so I dismiss it. Do you ever grid a property and only consider the square footage and ignore everything else?The simplicity is a given. The point is, if that's the way the MARKET works, why dismiss it entirely?