I wonder if the new format will include enough space in the SCA grid for differences among supplemental living areas to be adequately addressed???My state say residential cannot doing anything involving commercial use, period.
They want it on a 1004, hahahahh. I don't understand, what form would you put it on. So the 1-4 family form says residential, but you put a mixed use on it. Or was this order for a narrative.
Before certification, i did mixed use on the 1025. I would not be putting it on that form now, mislabelling the form.
How many individual units are here?The occupancy isn't necessarily the use.
Most of the kitchen improvements are personal property and not affixed to the realty. I don't see any aspects of the structures that are specific to a non-residential use. The typical buyer would normally be a residential owner-user, possibly operating a home office or such. It wouldn't be not a rental income oriented investor.
If the building area itself is atypical then that's what would make this a difficult property to appraise. But not because there is personal property onsite. That normally gets excluded whether a property is appraised by a CG or not.
Have you read your State's position on mixed use ? Even Fannie-FHA considers mixed us as residential as long as the total % of properties commercial use is less than the residential use. You may want to talk with someone at your State Board. I know mixed use is not rare or uncommon out here where a CR licenseMy state say residential cannot doing anything involving commercial use, period.
They want it on a 1004, hahahahh. I don't understand, what form would you put it on. So the 1-4 family form says residential, but you put a mixed use on it. Or was this order for a narrative.
Before certification, i did mixed use on the 1025. I would not be putting it on that form now, mislabelling the form.
So the plot thickens. Turns out the kitchen catering equipment is included in the sale price per listing agent. You also have 3-1 bedroom apartments on the second floor that are not a permitted use (conditional or otherwise) that would require a variance from the township. SFR use is grandfathered as the site does not meet current zoning and a conditional use permit is in place for the business. Not sure how you could shoehorn this onto a 1004 which is what the lender is requesting. The below is the flyer included within MLSThe occupancy isn't necessarily the use.
Most of the kitchen improvements are personal property and not affixed to the realty. I don't see any aspects of the structures that are specific to a non-residential use. The typical buyer would normally be a residential owner-user, possibly operating a home office or such. It wouldn't be a rental income oriented investor.
If the building area itself is atypical then that's what would make this a difficult property to appraise. But not because there is personal property onsite. That normally gets excluded whether a property is appraised by a CG or not.