D
Deleted member 128537
Guest
I'd have no problem doing it and have done so many times in the past. Its a final inspection.
My only caveat is that I require a copy of the plans and specs to be sure the property was constructed accordingly. A couple of times I pulled up to a home under construction that looked nothing like the plans. Owner and builder had changed the design (cheaper). That makes it interesting.
Ok. So I decided that I would do it. I get a great deal of work from this client. But I also emailed them my concerns regarding the previous report. And I decided to load up the report with caveats regarding scope of work and that by doing the final it doesn't mean I agree with the opinion of value. But when I did the inspection I found numerous errors in the report regarding the critical elements of the house:
1). The floor plan of the house in the report was not the floor plan of the actual house. The actual house was a 4 bedroom 3 bath house, the report said 3 bedrooms 2 baths.
2). The garage was a 3 car, but the report said 2 car.
Those were the major differences, the rest were minor and inconsequential and can happen in the middle of building a house, but don't really affect value.
I called the AMC and told them what had occurred. The result was the AMC called the lender (that I do lots of direct work for), and so now I think they have decided to order another appraisal.
POINT: Had I not done the final inspection the bank (a reliable client) would have a useless report.
I also chided the AMC for hiring appraisers from outside the area. And that this is the result. The appraiser was incredibly sloppy. And I told them I can't believe this even got through a desk review. I think they felt a bit embarrassed.