Yeah, that kind of thing might be common in other industries, but that doesn’t make it right—especially not in appraisal, where we’re supposed to be independent and unbiased. This isn’t just “how business works.” It’s a clear case of regulatory capture.
When someone goes from helping set the rules at TAF, to cashing in at a big AMC like Clear Capital, and then lands at the ASC to oversee the whole system—that’s not just a coincidence. That’s a broken system working exactly how it was designed to benefit insiders.
In most industries, there are at least rules in place—cooling-off periods, ethics boards, conflict disclosures. In appraisal, it’s a free-for-all. The same people writing the standards are turning around and profiting from them, then stepping into oversight roles pretending to be neutral. That doesn’t protect the public—it protects the pipeline.
And let’s be real: if this was happening in banking, accounting, or law, people would call it out immediately. In appraisal, they just say, “Well, that’s business.” No—it’s a conflict of interest, plain and simple. And the only people getting burned are the working appraisers trying to follow the rules while the game keeps changing above their heads.