Ken B
Elite Member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2004
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- Florida
Hmmm. Prior to the separation from NAR, the AIREA had tremendous lobbying power through the NAR. Shortly after the separation, the issue of de-mimimus levels for appraisals was changed to $250,000 for residential (from $50,000 I think). Lacking virtually ANY lobbying power, the AIREA had no ability to influence this decision. It is theorized that with the NAR, this De-Minimus level would have never changed.
Prior to separation a good 40% of my (and I suppose many appraiser's) residential volume was for home equity loans. It was great work. Up until the recent market downturn, virtually no bank or lending institution procured appraisals for second mortgages or HELOCKS under $250,000.
Even recently the AI discussed becoming affiliated again with the NAR. Were we today still affiliated, I doubt the NAR would have an appraisal designation (which is held by more than all AI members combined!!! - Dues paying NAR Appraiser members!!!) Also, I doubt there would be so much push today by the NAR to allow brokers to provide BPO's in lieu of appraisals. They are simply looking out for their own.
So it is you, sir, you I believe has erred, unless you can convince me why we are BETTER off today separated from the NAR???
There are so many holes in this post I don't know where to begin.
Let's start with the assertion that if AI and NAR were affiliated, NAR would not be pushing BPOs. Really? You really think that? You say that right after making a comment that there are more NAR-designated appraisers than AI members at any level? Really?
Let's put a twist on a worn out argument - name ONE thing of value that NAR does for those with NAR appraisal designations that they don't do for anyone who simply joins NAR so that they can get MLS access. ONE thing...ONE simple thing.