Shirley Yukon
Freshman Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2003
I see there’s been quite a few replies since I last posted. Since I don’t have time to repond to everyone, I’m going to reference only 3 replies. Mike in California, Randy Beigh and Mary Adamson.
Mike, I couldn’t have said it any better. Our turnaround is 2 days. That’s why we get so much business is because of our fast turnaround. We don’t take 1-2 weeks to do an appraisal, as most of the appraisers on this forum seem to do. If your calling listing agents on all the comps you pull, trying to figure out what financing is favorable and beating yourself up to try and figure out why one house sold for 5k more, you are wasting your time.
Randy, I respect that you disagree with me but let me ask you this. Say I use 3 comps where comps 1 & 2 are basically model matches as the subject and say the lot size is 5000 sq. ft. Comp 3 is a model match as well except that the lot size is 3000 sq. ft. comps 1 & 2 sold for 400k, comp 3 sold for 405k. Now I told you that I know the area and bigger lot sizes are desirable. Having said that and I adjust up for lot size for comp 3. Now everybody in this forum starts going crazy because I adjust up and you say there is nothing to support this. You guys are telling me I shouldn’t adjust for lot size, right? So let say I don't make an adjustment and make a comment such as 'homes with less than 2000 sq. ft. have similar lot utility so no adjustment was warranted'.
Now a week later, I get a condition saying they need another comp to support my value. I bring in comp 4, another model match but the lot size is 7000 sq. ft. This one sold for 410k. Now, obviously this comp sold for higher because of the lot size. Going by what you are telling me, I would not or could not make an adjustment here because there was no adjustment made on comp 3. How can I say that now a bigger lot size is more desirable when I originally stated that bigger lot size has no effect on marketability?
And finally to Mary who seems to be a bit confused. Since everyone seems to be quoting me, I will quote Mary’s email word for word.
HUH? HUH WHAT? You're not a trainee, but you recently received your license? YES, THAT’S USUALLY WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU GET YOUR LICENSE, YOUR NOT A TRAINEE ANYMORE. License for what? ERRR.. FISHING. WHAT DO YOU THINK? And you stated in an earlier post that you've been appraising for a year? YES, I’VE BEEN APPRAISING FOR A LITTLE MORE THAN A YEAR. DOUBLE HUH??? WHAT? That's more than enough time for OREA to get you listed. UH, HELLO. ANYBODY HOME? OREA ONLY RECOGNIZES LICENSED APPRAISERS. IF I JUST GOT MY LICENSE AND THEY TAKE UP TO A MONTH OR SO TO REGISTER YOU ON THEIR WEBSITE, HOW COULD I BE ON IT IF I ONLY HAD IT FOR A WEEK AND A HALF. There's something strange going on here..... YES, INDEED. I THINK YOU FORGOT TO TAKE YOUR MEDICATION.
Mike, I couldn’t have said it any better. Our turnaround is 2 days. That’s why we get so much business is because of our fast turnaround. We don’t take 1-2 weeks to do an appraisal, as most of the appraisers on this forum seem to do. If your calling listing agents on all the comps you pull, trying to figure out what financing is favorable and beating yourself up to try and figure out why one house sold for 5k more, you are wasting your time.
Randy, I respect that you disagree with me but let me ask you this. Say I use 3 comps where comps 1 & 2 are basically model matches as the subject and say the lot size is 5000 sq. ft. Comp 3 is a model match as well except that the lot size is 3000 sq. ft. comps 1 & 2 sold for 400k, comp 3 sold for 405k. Now I told you that I know the area and bigger lot sizes are desirable. Having said that and I adjust up for lot size for comp 3. Now everybody in this forum starts going crazy because I adjust up and you say there is nothing to support this. You guys are telling me I shouldn’t adjust for lot size, right? So let say I don't make an adjustment and make a comment such as 'homes with less than 2000 sq. ft. have similar lot utility so no adjustment was warranted'.
Now a week later, I get a condition saying they need another comp to support my value. I bring in comp 4, another model match but the lot size is 7000 sq. ft. This one sold for 410k. Now, obviously this comp sold for higher because of the lot size. Going by what you are telling me, I would not or could not make an adjustment here because there was no adjustment made on comp 3. How can I say that now a bigger lot size is more desirable when I originally stated that bigger lot size has no effect on marketability?
And finally to Mary who seems to be a bit confused. Since everyone seems to be quoting me, I will quote Mary’s email word for word.
HUH? HUH WHAT? You're not a trainee, but you recently received your license? YES, THAT’S USUALLY WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU GET YOUR LICENSE, YOUR NOT A TRAINEE ANYMORE. License for what? ERRR.. FISHING. WHAT DO YOU THINK? And you stated in an earlier post that you've been appraising for a year? YES, I’VE BEEN APPRAISING FOR A LITTLE MORE THAN A YEAR. DOUBLE HUH??? WHAT? That's more than enough time for OREA to get you listed. UH, HELLO. ANYBODY HOME? OREA ONLY RECOGNIZES LICENSED APPRAISERS. IF I JUST GOT MY LICENSE AND THEY TAKE UP TO A MONTH OR SO TO REGISTER YOU ON THEIR WEBSITE, HOW COULD I BE ON IT IF I ONLY HAD IT FOR A WEEK AND A HALF. There's something strange going on here..... YES, INDEED. I THINK YOU FORGOT TO TAKE YOUR MEDICATION.