Robert Paputseanos A5822 (Cherryville) By consent, the Board suspended Mr. Paputseanos’ residential license for a period of two years. The first twelve months of the suspension are active and the remainder is stayed. If Mr. Paputseanos completes the 15-hour National USPAP course, a course in appraiser liability and a course in business practices and ethics by September 15, 2007, the remainder of the suspenDisciplinary Actions 6 sion shall be inactive. The Board found that Mr. Paputseanos performed services for an appraisal company in North Carolina from August 2005 until January 2006. The appraisal company’s headquarters are located in Georgia, but it had an office in Cary, North Carolina until January 2006. For some assignments done for the company, Mr. Paputseanos did the inspection and took photographs, then emailed them to the company’s Cary office. A trainee in the office would enter all pertinent data, select the comparable sales, make adjustments to the sales, reconcile and assign value to the property, then affix Mr. Paputseanos’ signature. Initially, the completed reports were sent back to Mr. Paputseanos, who would review the reports and make any required changes. He would then email the reports back to the office and they would then be sent to the client. Over time, due to increasing assignment volume and demands from the appraisal company to improve turn around time, Mr. Paputseanos ceased looking at the work once the appraisal was completed. Mr. Paputseanos was under the impression that the person preparing the reports was a licensed appraiser, thus he did not declare this trainee with the Appraisal Board. There was no mention made on any of the appraisal reports that the trainee or any one else had provided significant professional assistance on the reports. Mr. Paputseanos failed to keep control of his signature and seal. He knew that another person was assembling appraisal reports and affixing his signature to them, yet he did not review those reports. He failed to take steps to ascertain whether the person preparing the reports was licensed, and he failed to supervise that person in the preparation of the reports.