Bill_FL
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- Florida
Yeah, I took the New York Institute of Photography correspondence course too.
If people can't look at an image and know that it required a wide-angle lens that may induce some barrel or pincushion distortion, they don't need to be reviewing appraisals.
I use the lens required to get the entire subject of that photo into the frame - I am not hung up on some camera distortion being 'misleading'. You have over-interpreted that word for appraisal use IMO. Otherwise, we ALL need DSLRs specifically with PC (perspective correcting) lenses since we often have to tilt the camera for exterior photos on uneven lots since we can't have any non-parallel lines in any of our photos by your (unrealistic) standard. Well, maybe you don't, since Florida is basically flat compared to my state of NC.
No, a misleading photo is "fixing" things in it, like cracked floors, or adding or taking away something in Photoshop that you do/don't want seen that was or wasn't actually there. A little perspective, barrel, or pincushion distortion are photographic anomalies, and do not rise to the level of being 'misleading'. Plus, interior photos are intended to simply show the interior condition/quality, not the size of the interior. Or do you lay out a measuring tape in-frame so they can see how big each room really is since scale in photos has always been an issue? (think straight on "dog nose" photos where the dog's nose is 2X the size of his body due to the distance relationship - and why do CSI's lay a ruler by evidence before imaging it? To establish scale and has nothing to do with the lens choice.)
Really, good on you for being a photographer and knowing your stuff, but you are way overthinking the term 'misleading' when it comes to the photography end of appraising. I've never had a callback or any other issue with any of my photographs, dating all the way back to the Polaroid days. And of the numerous cameras I own, the only ones I've never used (never tried to use) for appraising was my YashicaMat 124g TLR and my 5x7 view camera...and if I owned a medium format film scanner, I may have even used the TLR a time or two just for kicks. I love the 6x6 format - better than 4x6 anyway. And the view camera can do the aforementioned perspective corrections in a snap, but dragging the tripod and hood through the home for interior photos may take too long to be cost effective.![]()
Sorry, never even heard of the NY course you speak of. My point of the post was that you were putting down what others use, when in fact there are things that could be argued about the equipment you use.
I have one of those paper weights on my desk as well (the YashicaMat 124g). I did have a blast shooting Sebring races with it in the mid 80s. Panning race cars with a TLR can be an exercise in coordination. I like the 500CM better.
A good appraiser camera is simply the camera that the person is comfortable with. One that they can operate and get decent images out of. A good photographer could hand someone with a point and shoot their D3x and take the point and shoot, and still produce better images than the amateur. Shoot what you like. That is really all that is important.