pre-licensing, we had the most competent appraisers heading firms
No, "appraisal mills" were around for a long time. I think Henry Harrison had dozens of trainees at one point...
No complaint; no investigation.
Implies no reason to complain, right?
There it is in a nutshell. It is not about improved appraisers it's about restricting the number of appraisers.
Exactly...which aids the noble cause of "public trust" how?
Morality and ethics are not always one and the same,
I've heard everything now.
The bitter jabs at college degree people on this board is constant, while the college degree people are far more restrained - though we have reason to be bitter
That's stupid. I have a degree and 2 yr post-graduate degree but see no particular reason for a degree, not here nor for RE agents, loan officers, home inspectors, etc.
when you earlier referred to pre-licensing being so much better when you actually had no clue of what you were talking about.
Yep, locally in1992 we had two appraisers, both brokers trained under NAIFA classes and on FHA, VA panels. No big firms regionally. 90% of appraisals were VA, FHA. FNMA was v rare, more likely FmHA.
What is good for the profession. What is good for public trust.
You been spending time w Eli lately? Public trust is just another unicorn concept without much meaning and ill defined to boot.
Since there are competent commercial appraisers that do not have a college degree, might as well roll back those requirements too then.
Would it matter? If you can pass the test, by definition, you have enough education,right? If not, what metric measures competence? Ethics? Public trust? Degree? Voodoo?
everyone at Enron - degrees, they all have degrees.
Ken Lay had a doctorate.