- Joined
- Jan 15, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- California
I don't know one way or the other, but it seems unlikely to me that he would have said less to his employer less than what he would have said to Fannie.
Someone posted in a different thread (maybe USPAP)....
A difference between ethics and morals....
I believe there is a difference between lying and disingenuous....
I don't know one way or the other, but it seems unlikely to me that he would have said less to his employer less than what he would have said to Fannie.
So what?coester was a member of revaa.
15th st is a party.
Speed. Simple as that. We get inspections done in an average of 1.4 days. Appraisers, on average, wait longer than that to even call. Appraisers might say they don't need that speed, but that is what they want.
Fine, let's pull on that string a little. I'm not real great at following the various personal feuds people have with each other on this forum because as an appraiser I have a low EQ; so I'm not conversant on exactly what your beef is with him. What kinds of info do you think that he could provide but is choosing not to provide to you? Let's suss that out and see if there might be some reasonable explanation for it.
Didn't I just provide one possible explanation? That perhaps Fannie was selling their program to the lenders on the basis of a cost reduction that might not actually exist? Would that not be a good thing for Fannie to understand?
Correct me if I'm wrong but the impression I am getting from you at the moment is that you think SL has set a fee for these assignments and is imposing that fee on appraisers.
To answer your question....
If he gave a fee range that SL typically gives the majority of work....
That would be helpful....