This was what I was asked for by a client in an addendum letter about a recent 1004 appraisal I completed.
"Please provide the data & analysis used to derive the room count, condition and GLA adjustments. If paired sales analysis is utilized, the appraiser cannot just say an adjustment was made and the amount, based on experience, or paired sales were used; the actual pairing/analysis must be included in the report. If another method is utilized, the thought process behind it needs to be thoroughly explained."
This is a Summary Report and I have never been asked to put my Paired Sales data in my report.
What say you?
My guess, based on the specific example they used, you said, “based on experience”. That is code for, “POA”. If you didn’t, you must have-through other wording or lack of words-given that impression. GSEs are cracking down on lazy comments (see another topic in the General category of this site).
I rarely get something like this, though I admit, I have. That is because I try and explain the adjustments rather than just point them out. They don’t have to be told you adjusted comp 2 $10,000 for location. They can see the grid. What they can’t see is HOW you arrived at that.
Do I provide the data on all adjustments? No. However, I do for the intangible adjustments, i.e., location, quality of construction, view, etc. Usually, it is nothing more than, “comp 2 is adjusted for location next to a commercial property. Support is from comparison with comps 1 and 3, which have locations similar to the subject property.”
For across the board adjustments, which underwriters cringe with, I state, “support for the pool adjustment was derived from a sale at 123 Main Street, a dissimilar property that sold in May for $zzz,zzz. This property was compared with two other sales that were similar except for a pool, the difference in prices, support an adjustment of $10,000.” Something like that is really all you need to say.
When times are slow, I work on a database of adjustments for the smaller items (bath, garage counts, C-air, as well as GLA adjustments). I then plug them in, which makes pairing analysis for the other adjustments easier to explain in the comments.
Do they really expect you to quantify every single adjustment? No. But if you explain like the above, the underwriter gets the feeling that you actually do put thought into the adjustments and will leave you alone.