If I can demonstrate something with data, then what I "think" is irrelevant. Isn't that what appraisers are supposed to do?
It's not just an opinion, its an opinion that is credible (which means supported by evidence and logic (aka, data))

Oh, you have Freedom, brother. The issue you have is that the users have the same freedom.without freedom of speech...there can be no wisdom![]()
Actually, you can say anything you want. But just like you can't yell "fire" in a crowded theatre............................


Oh, you have Freedom, brother. The issue you have is that the users have the same freedom.![]()

Oakland has its crime problems for years but we can't mention crime in our reports (that's the way it is).It is well documented that there is an inverse relationship between crime rate and property value. Not much to argue about there. The issue, at least as I see it from an Economics perspective, is that causality runs both ways. Do the lower property values lead to more crime, or does the crime lead to lower property values?
Studies that some might find interesting:
- "A Note on the Value of Crime Control: Evidence from the Property Market" (Thaler, 1978)
- "Property Values, parks, and crime: a hedonic analysis in Baltimore" (Troy & Grove, 2008)