Zoe
Elite Member
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2020
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- Tennessee
That's okay by me. It cost NAR a bunch of money to change it. I don't have a problem with that. I wish NAR would push hard for separation of appraisal and appraisal management fees on truth in lending disclosures.And the newer NAR standards are complex IMO. Buyer's contract includes space for buyer to indicate sales commission % paid by buyer to his agent-- unless eventual seller agrees to pay some or all of the buyer's agent commission that is subtracted from the amount the buyer contract indicates-- although buyer's agent cant receive a total commission from seller and buyer together that is higher than what the original buyer's contract indicates the %age that buyer agrees to pay. Crux of the regs is that a MLS listing can't describe the amount of agents' commissions the seller is willing to pay--although it's perfectly fine for that info to be published on any other media, and agents are free to discuss it between themselves. [ Kinda sorta seems to be much ado 'bout nothing, although presumably integral to the appraiser's contract analysis...]
NAR had to pay some big fines on commissions disclosures I think. I am sure that hurt. I wish the same penalty on appraisal management companies.