D
Deleted member 128537
Guest
In this situation if it does not have condo in the legal and it has a specific site size, then I would put it on the 1004 and state it's a PUD. It's just an attached unit on the 1004.
IMHO.
IMHO.
Is it this one? If not, you may be able to find the info on yours - online
http://www.uplandsummithoa.com/about.php
DOCUMENTS http://www.uplandsummithoa.com/documents.php
For the 3,500th time........a CONDO is a form of ownership, not an archtectural style. In many PUD's, and especially in my market, we have PUD's that have many types of archtectural styles such as single family detached, townhouses, attached and detached condo's. And, in many cases in the larger PUD's there are also commercial properties, fire stations, post office, etc.
Tell the client that it is a CONDO since that is the form of ownership and a PUD is a "Planned Unit development", not a type of real estate.
Don, I realize Condo is a form of ownership. My dilemma was that one legal description noted 'int in common area', whereas the legal description provided on title did not. Wouldn't 'int in common area' indicate condo ownership?
No, it wasn't that one, but thank you Mike!
If the property is located in Orange County, CA and the APN starts with a "900" number, it's a condo.
Which Development is your subject in?