Dan Padsio
Freshman Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2016
- Professional Status
- Appraiser Trainee
- State
- New Jersey
Of course some of the sections marked "None" would not make up the difference but the amount of things missing start to add up. The biggest hits were from the comps used (home is a split, appraiser used all cape cods and another split level that was literally a gut renovation home, while the home being appraised was a top to bottom full renovation). Let alone using not similar comps, the errors within those comps were ridiculous - wrong land sizes (verified by tax records along with a simple google earth area measurement), saying basements were finished when clearly not, wrong number of bedrooms, etc. Who knows what sources were used, but cleary this guy is incompetent. Maybe he was jealous of the homeowner, has an ego, who knows? Fact is things were incorrect and not opinion items (fair vs avg condition for example).
Our rep was told by the bank the appraiser refused to respond to the concerns. So according to whatever law changed in recent years, who should be taking the hit here to make sure it doesn't happen again? Bank has to use an outside company that hires these guys so there is no conflicts of interest. Ok so who gets it then, the AMC, since they are the ones who picked this guy?
Our rep was told by the bank the appraiser refused to respond to the concerns. So according to whatever law changed in recent years, who should be taking the hit here to make sure it doesn't happen again? Bank has to use an outside company that hires these guys so there is no conflicts of interest. Ok so who gets it then, the AMC, since they are the ones who picked this guy?