The way I look at it, technology is impacting apparisals and people perceptions of appraisals, and how that goes forward depends on many factors. Are appraisals just some outdated thing that takes time and screws up deals, when AVM's and big data able to estimate value in some usable range with a non appraiser inspecting? Does the APPRAISER have a role as an appraiser ...is the speed bump of a pause to get the appraisal done a good thing ? Is the fact that an appraiser can in fact, "kill some deals ", a market factor that helps stabilize markets , even if a little ? I can hear it now, folks screaming " Stabilizing markets is not the appraiser's job !" to that I say, it is not our job, but the RESULT of our job, if done correctly, an OMV, would have a stabilizing effect on markets ( even if a little )
The problem in the past was not enough data, or the data was hard to dig up, proprietary to MLS local or searching records. Now we have a plethora of data, an overload of it. Instant online RE sites that with a click , will spit out a value estimate of your house, a rental estimate, AND make an offer on it, all at the same time !
I clicked an address I was looking for of a comp, online ...and Realist and Zillow both spat out estimates, and had offers in case I was the owner and wanted to sell. Thing is, the Realtor.com site had an estimate and offer of 430k, Zillow had 475k. So which was right, or was neither of them right ? If I clicked on 10 other sites, would I get 10 different value estimates ?
An appraiser, if allowed to do their role as a professional appraiser instead of being a "vendor" has a valuable role in the process. But if they are pressured by ultra speed, impact of low fees to get an order makes an appraiser a vendor first and appraiser second, combined with fear of losing business by coming in "low", means the appraiser role is compromised.
I
What I don't understand is why lenders get a free pass on warranties and liability for value if they choose to use a waiver shifting liability and cost of a default for these loans to tax payers. Wrt decision made on their behalf...do the tax payers know about it or approve it ? Even if the risk of default is supposedly lower on a waiver, there is still a risk, so why is it for a waiver 100% on tax payer, vs a traditional loan with appraisal where the lender has responsibility wrt to the valuation in case of a default ?