Would you not at least say that the sales are outside the neighborhood?And in my opinion comps outside of delineated neighborhood boundaries are acceptable as long as they are located within the subject's general market area....
This is what I do not understand about CRs. I see it on virtually every rural appraisal a CR does on a form. They go adjustment crazy. Buyers are looking at the big picture, not the minutiae of differences. If you have 3 comps, then making more than 2 adjustments is suspect at best. If you have 6 comps, 5 adjustments max you out statistically. You are now creating noise. If nothing else, find better comps.They adjusted for just about anything.
The oa was $483K-$538K, value $505K. Mine was a lot tighter. But $506K was my high adjusted valueI'm curious... how large is adjusted sale price range? You mentioned the value is within "bounds".
Then why make such a small adjustment? That implies something that is unlikely to exist. Again buyers are not quants detailing the filling in of a formula of value.The client does not care about style or a minor adjustment like a $1000 for a fireplace. I've done hundreds of reviews, they do not care about that stuff because it is minor and does not impact anything.
Minor mud ?right grant. if there are better missed comps, you put them in. if they confirm the value what need else be said. maybe something corrected or added upon. but i hate messy appraisals even when they got the value right. how much minor mud are you going to get into.
But that is so minor a 1k fireplace adjustment a client could care less about it. I personally do not make it but sine ti is so minor it does not materially affect teh value or credibility in the report in any sense that mattes.Then why make such a small adjustment? That implies something that is unlikely to exist. Again buyers are not quants detailing the filling in of a formula of value.
You make the case for getting rid of human produced appraisals....Then why make such a small adjustment? That implies something that is unlikely to exist. Again buyers are not quants detailing the filling in of a formula of value.
How did you get "your" value?The oa was $483K-$538K, value $505K. Mine was a lot tighter. But $506K was my high adjusted value
I'm sorry, but, this sounds like a problematic (IMO, without knowing more than you posted ) review. The client does not care about style or a minor adjustment like a $1000 for a fireplace. I've done hundreds of reviews, they do not care about that stuff because it is minor and does not impact anything.)
Maybe you should look at the 2000 before you get froggy again. It asks a yes or no question about each section of the 1004and also asks for commentary whether or not you answer yes or no. It also asks if the value is ACCURATE.The 2000 field review does not ask if the reviewer finds the value reasonable; it asks whether the reviewer agrees or disagrees with the review. If the reviewer finds 6 out of 7 comp choices bad, I don't understand how they can agree with the value.
Only because the oa had an arbitrary neighborhood boundary that made no sense. No reason to exclude the area where their comps were located.I do not understand this- you claim 6 of the 7 sales were outside the neighborhood - , if there were similar sales inside the neighborhood that should have been used, then why didn't you put them on a grid and see what the value would be ? Were there similar comps in the neighborhood, or not ?
Not the least bit concerned. They may question some of my "opinions". But hard to argue outright factual mistakes. Like wrong zoning or flood zone. I suppose you would have said a 20 cents per sf adjustment for lot size is AOKReviews can get reviewed and sometimes are
He is focused on a petty thing, and THAT is what is making the case for appraisals eliminated.You make the case for getting rid of human produced appraisals....
And why some borrowers think appraisals are useless....