The key issue is compensation commensurate with the amount of work. Compare the size of a report to that of 18 years ago. The liability. The cost. What and why is there "value" to the banks in having the cheapest fee and fastest turn times? Does quality ever count?
I think for some of us, we felt like we have been sidelined for "easy" jobs (surely some assignments are easy??) yet expected to do the difficult ones cheap. I used to do those hard ones cheap with the unspoken assumption that I would get reasonable fees on the EZ PZ ones. So now the quickees are going to younger, less expensive appraisers while the "old heads" are "break glass in case of emergency" and expected to be the old experienced Macedonian soldiers who go in and show Alexander's young troops how it is done. If they want to equalize the field, they could. Let the "newbies" do a few complex ones and if they refuse...then give the easy ones to the old guys and see if the newbies don't make the effort to take increasingly difficult assignments. They are getting a bye. And playing appraisers against each other even in the face of increasing short supply of appraisers.
Which reminds me. I just sent an email this afternoon to a bank client who owes me for a land / mineral appraisal I did in January...that sucks too. Ask the banker why they don't collect the appraisers fee up front like they are supposed to do.