• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Global Economy Bursting?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fed Responds to a Grim Reality

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/15/b...915&adxnnlx=1347714084-dbcZT7UHXyZVao2eTLmYxg

The very word “employment” did not appear in a policy statement until 2008. The Fed was focused on inflation, officials said time and again.

That era is over. The signs have been there for some time, but they are now unmistakable. Ben S. Bernanke, the Fed’s chairman, made clear on Thursday that job creation is its primary concern for the foreseeable future.

The remarkable transformation of the Fed’s priorities is partly a response to the grim reality that more than 20 million Americans cannot find full-time jobs. It is made easier by the fact that the Fed has been so successful in stabilizing inflation right around the 2 percent annual pace that officials consider most healthy.

But as circumstances have changed, so has the Fed itself. Under the leadership of Mr. Bernanke — with considerable prodding and support from a board almost entirely appointed by President Obama — the central bank has gradually concluded that it has a responsibility to act more forcefully, and, equally important, that it has the ability to spur job creation directly.

Some argue that the Fed’s efforts to spur job growth by decreasing long-term borrowing costs will inevitably result in higher inflation, eventually reducing growth and employment.

Mr. Bernanke’s predecessor, Alan Greenspan, once told his board that he did not want to mention job creation as a policy objective because the Fed would be making a promise that it lacked the power to keep.
 
Give us SPENDING JOBS

Fed Responds to a Grim Reality

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/15/b...915&adxnnlx=1347714084-dbcZT7UHXyZVao2eTLmYxg

The very word “employment” did not appear in a policy statement until 2008. The Fed was focused on inflation, officials said time and again.

That era is over. The signs have been there for some time, but they are now unmistakable. Ben S. Bernanke, the Fed’s chairman, made clear on Thursday that job creation is its primary concern for the foreseeable future.

The remarkable transformation of the Fed’s priorities is partly a response to the grim reality that more than 20 million Americans cannot find full-time jobs. It is made easier by the fact that the Fed has been so successful in stabilizing inflation right around the 2 percent annual pace that officials consider most healthy.

But as circumstances have changed, so has the Fed itself. Under the leadership of Mr. Bernanke — with considerable prodding and support from a board almost entirely appointed by President Obama — the central bank has gradually concluded that it has a responsibility to act more forcefully, and, equally important, that it has the ability to spur job creation directly.

Some argue that the Fed’s efforts to spur job growth by decreasing long-term borrowing costs will inevitably result in higher inflation, eventually reducing growth and employment.

Mr. Bernanke’s predecessor, Alan Greenspan, once told his board that he did not want to mention job creation as a policy objective because the Fed would be making a promise that it lacked the power to keep.


Well if they just went ahead and gave us the money then it would be our NEW JOB to spend it.

.... I did not have to score a 1590 on my SAT and grow a beard to figure that one out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the central bank has gradually concluded that it has a responsibility to act more forcefully, and, equally important, that it has the ability to spur job creation directly.

Some argue that the Fed’s efforts to spur job growth by decreasing long-term borrowing costs will inevitably result in higher inflation
And higher inflation isn't a problem if you have no money and are young and expect your wages to rise over time....

But for the baby boomers, that huge lump in the demographic curve, inflation dooms most of them because they have little or no savings...AND, are neophytes at investing what savings they have...They are more likely to lose in gaming the stock market - which appears to be a goal of Bernanke. Starve out the elderly. In doing so the unintended consequence is that the elderly will remain employed by necessity. And that means the younger folk who would replace them in those middle management and higher paying jobs will be old by the time they have a chance to be promoted.....
 
Fed’s Lacker Opposed QE3 as Tantamount to Fiscal Policy

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-...posed-qe3-as-tantamount-to-fiscal-policy.html

Richmond Federal Reserve President Jeffrey Lacker said that he opposed the central bank’s third round of quantitative easing in mortgage-backed securities because allocating credit should be the province of fiscal authorities such as the U.S. Treasury or Congress.

“I strongly opposed purchasing additional agency mortgage- backed securities,” Lacker said in a statement released today by the Richmond Fed. “Such purchases, as compared to purchases of an equivalent amount of U.S. Treasury securities, distort investment allocations and raise interest rates for other borrowers.”

Lacker said that “channeling the flow of credit to particular economic sectors is an inappropriate role for the Federal Reserve.”
 
FED funnels money to "desirables"

Fed’s Lacker Opposed QE3 as Tantamount to Fiscal Policy

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-...posed-qe3-as-tantamount-to-fiscal-policy.html

Richmond Federal Reserve President Jeffrey Lacker said that he opposed the central bank’s third round of quantitative easing in mortgage-backed securities because allocating credit should be the province of fiscal authorities such as the U.S. Treasury or Congress.

“I strongly opposed purchasing additional agency mortgage- backed securities,” Lacker said in a statement released today by the Richmond Fed. “Such purchases, as compared to purchases of an equivalent amount of U.S. Treasury securities, distort investment allocations and raise interest rates for other borrowers.”

Lacker said that “channeling the flow of credit to particular economic sectors is an inappropriate role for the Federal Reserve.”


Congress no longer needs to act anymore ... the FED can just funnel money to "desirables"
 
Gee, perhaps the EU can get the Vatican to endorse the plan and we can call it the Holy Roman Empire II...
 
QE3: buying $40 billion a month of mortgage backed securities, who wins?



CS-research-GSE-holdings.png


The Fed’s purchases of [agency mortgage] bonds have helped their yields fall to 2.2 percent. But the cost of mortgages to borrowers hasn’t fallen anywhere near as much. The banks are choosing not to reduce mortgage rates further. One reason: By keeping the rates elevated, they are able to earn much larger profits when they sell the mortgages into the bond market.

And more intermediation value-add means more money for intermediaries. The Fed's reducing the cost of GSE pool money, in an environment where banks are still figuring out how to move that money to homeowners and how much of it to keep for themselves, does seem like a nice opportunity for those banks to keep more for themselves.
 
EU and FED austerity . they are the same

Gerald Celente is saying that the monthly figure is 85 billion, not 40 billion .......

.... In Spain folks on the left and the right are marching together against austerity ......

.... The FED creates an "austerity" through food and energy rising prices ...

.... the right and the left need to come together in this country .....

... Some Spaniards are not fooled
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top