If agents are doing PDC's. How many do you think are using runners for these inspections? I know agents that have others do almost every task except collecting the check. I almost said "hanging the sign." but I know some have runners doing that for them.
Yep. And there are still people in this thread who think AMC/national firm staff positions are what they are advertised to be.
?? What is considered an "error" in a traditional appraisal and since the appraiser completes a hybrid appraisal how can there be a difference in error rate of any consequence between a hybrid and traditional appraisal? What kind of errors are they...that supposedly impact loan risk?One thing that amuses me is the number who seem to think that people like me are working with some some pre-ordained outcome in mind. I won't speak for anyone else, but that's just not how I work. As George is so fond of saying, the conclusions are supposed to come as the result of the analysis, not in lieu of the analysis. That is why the process is referred to as "Test and Learn."
Something new is tested and the results are compared to the results from the existing process. Unless the new thing is as good as the old thing, it is not adopted.
I wonder how many saw this article last week.
https://sf.freddiemac.com/articles/...aiser-the-lowdown-on-property-data-collection
Errors regarding condition ratings are 200% higher in traditional appraisal reports as compared to hybrids.
Errors involving not requiring repairs and/or inspections, in accordance with published policy, are 225% higher in traditional reports as compared to hybrids.
That latter is an especially big deal. There are many reasons why a required repair or inspection might not be called out in an appraisal report, but that type of mistake directly impacts loan risk.

You are entitled to or view, but just so the facts are straight: (1) I never ran an AMC. I worked at an AMC. I went there primarily to train appraisers on proper methods and techniques. (2) I was that AMC's REVAA rep for a cycle, but there was no pay for that. In fact, companies have to pay to be part of REVAA.Sure. A guy that ran an AMC and spent years being a paid advocate for revaa is now completely unbiased.
Sounds a lot like trust the science![]()
You could help I think by communicating with independent fee appraisers and all licensed appraisers.You are entitled to or view, but just so the facts are straight: (1) I never ran an AMC. I worked at an AMC. I went there primarily to train appraisers on proper methods and techniques. (2) I was that AMC's REVAA rep for a cycle, but there was no pay for that. In fact, companies have to pay to be part of REVAA.
Peace