shrubberyvaluation
Elite Member
- Joined
- May 2, 2012
- Professional Status
- Appraiser Trainee
- State
- Maryland
1) If it was not complete didn't the lender give the appraiser the specs? As long as the GLA and layout is correct this should not be an issue.Numerous Problems the lender identified with the appraisal:
(1) Concern the appraiser appraised the wrong house - This is when the appraiser originally called Tidewater but the amounts weren't known yet. The reason is that the following day after the appraisal was supposedly completed the appraiser had to come back to the site to pick up their measuring tool which they forgot and it was found on another lot of a house that was nowhere near completion and had less upgrades than mine and figured he may have appraised the wrong house. Lender contacted the VA about it and they said to do a phone call and compare the pictures in the report. The pictures matched the house he was supposed to appraise. But when he went inside the house the day he picked up his measuring tool, the builder happened to be doing work on the house and the appraiser acted like he had not been in the house before (the appraiser is apparently in his late 70's). The appraiser then asked the lender for the builder to contact him the next day which he did and once the builder got off the phone he contacted the lender and stated that the appraiser was "very confused".
(2) Errors on the appraisal report - he checked water/septic saying hookups were not available. This is true for the areas outside the development, but the new development hooks-up into the Marion County Utilities for public water/sewer via the Oak Run retirement community plant.
(3) Appraiser also marked market appeal for the defined area as "average" and prices as "stable". Not even close. There has been a significant increase of sales in the past six months supporting the purchase price, and especially within the last 3 months, but the appraiser used two new construction homes that closed in December 2020 and one that closed in April 2021 that were all under contract months before under 2020 pricing before the market took off.
(4) One of the comps the builder's realtor submitted in a community called Marco Polo just sold for $326,000 and was the most similar in size, lot, and square footage, and upgrades. The VA appraiser omitted it with the reason "out of price range". Nobody knows what that means. It was not a one-off sale as there were other sales in similar size and square footage, but on larger lots (about .5-.75 acre) where the appraiser omitted completely for lot size.
All of this was submitted by the lender along with my letter requesting a ROV to the VA RLC in St Pete at the end of September. They told the lender they would issue a NOV by 10/7. When that day came the value had been upped to $260K or 10%. This appears to be the maximum the VA is able to adjust without doing extensive field work.
At this point the lender told me they had done what they could and that requests from me would have more weight with the VA going forward. So I sent another request (10/7) and actually CC'd the VA appraiser who promptly replied "Sorry, I cannot help you". The other recent appraisal info for the nearby houses wasn't known yet otherwise I would have felt comfortable moving to another financing source. But the VA never responded. When I got the updated appraisal info for the nearby houses, I forwarded that on 10/18, but received a reply that my request had been denied 10/14. I asked why. They never responded. That's when I filed the request with Rubio's office and received my case number this past Friday.
Everyone but the VA appraiser (builder, realtor, lender, even the VA RLC) acknowledged that the $237K was an inaccurate estimate of value. The issue is if the VA is limited to upping the value 10% and the appraisal was way off to begin with, the 10% was inadequate. They apparently would have to do field work and additional extensive review which I guess they didn't want to do not because there wasn't merit but because their just being lazy and thinking no one will question what they issue. But I did and that's why I submitted the request to Rubio's office. According to the comps that were used on the FHA loan, the NOV on the house I was trying to buy should have come in somewhere around $300-$310K.
If my Congressional inquiry is successful the NOV will get adjusted again and then hopefully I will be able to return to the builder to do a new contract. It'll probably be too late by the time all of this is completed, but if I can help one veteran not have to go through what I have, it'll be worth it. It's one thing to lose bidding wars, it's another to do due diligence and go buy new construction where we find a local builder who is actually charging less than the high volume builders in the area while providing a greater quality product, and yet that house fail to appraise due to an incompetent appraiser.
Oh, and while we are on local builders, that reminds me about something. My guess is they probably had to get funding via Construction loans to build the homes they do. Aren't those loan amounts released as the home is completed and aren't the homes evaluated throughout the process for appraisal purposes to ensure the bank gets their money back at the home's completion/closing? I mean if a brand new home was going to actually appraise for $40K less than the actual purchase price, then why would the bank keep lending money for the construction loan?
2) I wouldn't care too much unless he was adjusting for this or all of the comps had different water/sewer and was not explained.
3) A lot of places in the country prices have been on a significant rise; however, there are some pockets near me that have been stable and I don't know your area. Using comps that were contracted over a year to a year and a half ago doesn't seem like the best to show current market conditions, unless there is a lack of better comparable sales that are more recent.
4) What and who is defining a "price range." Sounds like nonsense to me.
People here are skeptical because we have seen many people lie or exaggerate. There are appraisers that do not provide credible reports but people here will not throw people under the bus based one person's word they do not know. I'm just commenting based on your words and my lack of knowledge of the area. I feel that if he could of provided a couple more recent comps, even if they needed a little more adjusting it would of gone a long way to lend more support, but that is just me and I don't know if anything else comparable was available.