Those figures include the thousands of cash back sales that never would have happened without the cash back fraud taking place. Some of you might be amazed of the fast growing numbers of these, many closing at $100,000 - $400,000 ABOVE what they had been listed for sale for, that are now being reported from all over the country, but mainly in the areas where exorbitant appreciation was found during these past few years.Terrel, I agree with your slow motion analogy. However, it is amazing that the news is very negative about housing. A 6.5% average increase from Feb. to March of homes for sale in 18 metro areas is not what I call good news. Where are the buyers?
April 5 (Bloomberg) -- Two years ago, General Motors Corp. promised dealers it would do whatever it took to reverse falling sales in the American cities that set the industry's trends. The slump has only worsened.
Toyota Motor Corp. outsells GM two-to-one in Los Angeles and by a slightly smaller margin in Miami, according to U.S. data compiled by R.L. Polk & Co. In the New York City metropolitan area, where GM had a 4.5 percentage point lead in market share five years ago, Toyota has surged to a four-point advantage.
``In some of these markets, our share has fallen off rather dramatically,'' Mark LaNeve, GM's head of North American sales and marketing said in an interview. ``You can almost re-enter the market like you would enter a new country.''
Gaining market share in big cities is important to car companies because, like many other consumer trends, car-buying habits are set there. Without significant presence in places like New York, GM can't gain the brand awareness to attract affluent buyers and return to profitability.
Toyota sales have risen 36 percent in the New York, Los Angeles and Miami metro markets since 2002 while GM's dipped about 20 percent in those three markets combined, according to data compiled by Southfield, Michigan-based Polk.
GM lost more than $12.4 billion over the last two years.
Speaking of "stats", how is it that NAR data is so far out of whack with other reporting agencies on things like inventory and sales?Those figures include the thousands of cash back sales that never would have happened without the cash back fraud taking place. Some of you might be amazed of the fast growing numbers of these, many closing at $100,000 - $400,000 ABOVE what they had been listed for sale for, that are now being reported from all over the country, but mainly in the areas where exorbitant appreciation was found during these past few years.
If those deals were taken out of these stats, what would the real stats be???
Like NAR, the government reserves the right to revise the numbers a year later, after the news and no one is paying attention.What's out of whack is the employment numbers on Friday states up 56K in CONSTRUCTION ,..Where are they building , Mexico City?..The government has cooked the books for so long I believe government stats are now taken from a large bowl of soup..
“Real estate is going to be a drag on the rest of the economy,” said Ryan Ratcliff, an economist for the Anderson Forecast at the University of California, Los Angeles, referring to California’s situation. “But previous recessions have always had construction plus something else combining to create job loss. Without a second source of weakness, we’re predicting sluggishness, but not a recession.”
Great news! No recession, just sluggishness generating a $1 billion shortfall in tax revenues in January. 30% of car purchases were financed with home equity loans ... 8 of the 10 major subprime lenders are in California, all either in bankruptcy or soon to be there, laying off thousands of people. Not to mention record foreclosures and short sales, still rising in California.A little bit of a new twist: housing's slump and its effect on taxes. I know it has been discussed here before, but maybe not in this much detail.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/08/us/08housing.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&th&emc=th
Of course, there is also this: ... California’s situation. “But previous recessions have always had construction plus something else combining to create job loss. Without a second source of weakness, we’re predicting sluggishness, but not a recession.”