• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Housing Bubble Bursting?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lawmarkers say it again: Mortgage Bondholders Should Bear Subprime Loan Risk

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aC2vvj3s9w9A&refer=worldwide

April 10 (Bloomberg) -- The top Democrat and Republican on the House Financial Services Committee said investors in mortgage bonds should be liable for deceptive loans made by banks.


Democratic Chairman Barney Frank of Massachusetts and Spencer Bachus of Alabama, the committee's highest-ranking Republican, said such legislation would discourage lenders from extending loans to people with poor credit histories by making it more difficult and expensive for the banks to sell the mortgages.


``More money was being lent than should have been lent,'' Frank said in an interview from Washington. Frank, who last month predicted that the House would approve such a bill this year, said growth in the market for mortgage bonds ``provided liquidity without responsibility.''


An agreement by the two lawmakers may increase the likelihood legislation will be passed this year. The cost of borrowing would rise and curb financing for some lenders and subprime homebuyers, said David Brownlee, who oversees $14 billion as head of fixed income at Sentinel Asset Management in Montpelier, Vermont. It would also reduce opportunities for the Wall Street firms that pool the home loans as securities.


A total of $2.12 trillion of mortgage-backed bonds were sold last year, according to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, a New York-based trade group. About $540 billion of the bonds are backed by subprime mortgages, or loans to people with poor credit, up threefold since 2001, data compiled by New York-based Bear Stearns Cos. show.
 
Alt-A Mortgage Market Showing Weakness

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070410/alt_a_mortgages.html?.v=1

Weakness Spreads From Subprime Mortgage Market to So-Called Alt-A Segment

NEW YORK (AP) -- Turmoil in the mortgage market is ensnaring more companies who lend to people with decent credit.
The spread of home lending woes beyond loans to those with weak credit threatens to reduce the availability of loans for some consumers and even threaten the existence of some lenders.

Rising delinquencies and defaults among subprime borrowers -- those with blemished credit histories -- have resulted in more than two dozen lenders going out of business, moving into bankruptcy protection or putting themselves up for sale.

Among the biggest Alt-A lenders in 2006 were IndyMac Bancorp Inc. of Pasadena, Calif; Countrywide Financial Corp. of Calabasas, Calif.; Residential Capital, or ResCap, of Minneapolis, a holding company for the residential mortgage operations of General Motors; EMC Mortgage Corp. in Irving, Texas, a subsidiary of The Bear Stearns Cos.; and Washington Mutual Inc. of Seattle.

Glenn Costello, a managing director with the Fitch Ratings agency in New York, said that some of the Alt-A lenders were trying to distinguish themselves from others, arguing that they were worth investors' continued attention because they had lower delinquencies and fewer problems.

"But the fact remains that for some of the riskier products they originate, there's a lack of demand for them" as investors get pickier about the market, he said. "Investors just aren't willing to pay what they used to."



Now the so-called Alternative-A mortgage sector, which loans to borrowers with better credit than subprime borrowers but not quite prime, is starting to hurt
 
Mountain of Sub-Prime Mortgages Primed for Avalanche

http://www.erate.com/sub-prime-mortgage-crisis.htm

Sub-prime and what’s referred to as Alt A lending has exploded as real estate values skyrocketed resulting in lenders willingness to take on more risk along with riskier borrowers. The sub-prime market is comprised of borrowers having credit scores less than 620 and the Alt A market consists of borrowers having credit scores typically between 700 and 620 who cannot qualify for a loan through the common conventional guidelines of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two congressionally chartered mortgage behemoths. For example, an Alt A borrower might need 100% financing to purchase or refinance a home or they may have exceedingly high debt-to-income ratios in qualifying for a loan. These are loans a prime or traditional A paper lender would not be able to do.

The problem of increasingly risky lending practices was compounded by the lack of regulatory oversight in an area within the financial system where sub-prime mortgage lenders operate outside the realm or jurisdiction of federal regulators. It is actually a loose structure of state and federal agencies that oversee the part of the financial arena where the sub-prime players operate. Many of these lenders are not subject to Federal Reserve supervision as their primary regulators are state banking agencies. National banks are not typically the dominant players in the sub-prime market. Wall Street encouraged and participated in this risky behavior as well as higher returns on investment were demanded in a low interest rate environment as mortgage back-securities which are packaged by Wall Street and sold to institutional investors and pension funds.
It is estimated that the total outstanding sub-prime loans amount to $1.3 trillion. This comprises approximately 20% of the total housing market in the United States and shockingly equals nearly the entire economic activity of the state of California in scale. Unfortunately the number of Alt-A loans is estimated to be about 20% of the total market as well. This is a mountain of high risk debt potentially waiting to avalanche on top of the lenders, borrowers and the U.S. economy.

Although many lenders loosened their underwriting standards and began making riskier loans throughout the housing boom of 2003 through 2005, it has taken a while for this problem to surface because of the types of loans that lenders have been generating. Many of the loans originated during this time had artificially low rates of interest and fall into the category of option ARMS or interest only loans. Had housing prices continued to climb as they had between 2000 and 2005 it would have been possible for borrowers with these types of loans, who have not paid down much if any principal on their mortgages, to refinance as they would have built up sufficient equity in their homes which would allow them to do so. However now that real estate values have stopped climbing in many areas of the country, lenders are now turning cautious and tightening their underwriting guidelines just as an estimated $500 billion in adjustable rate mortgages are set to adjust their rates this year. Refinancing may not be possible for many of these sub-prime and Alt A borrowers, some of whom could now be facing rates as high as 12%.
 
Risky loans - alive and well

http://money.cnn.com/2007/04/10/real_estate/alta_alive.moneymag/index.htm

Option ARMs remain an option. Despite problems in the mortgage market, brokers say lenders are still willing to make risky loans - including those that allow borrowers to make monthly payments that don't even cover the interest (so-called "option ARMs").

Also still widely available are "no-doc" loans, which require no income verification, and mortgages with no downpayment.

All of those loans fall into the so-called Alternative-A or Alt-A mortgage market, which caters to people with average credit scores who want riskier mortgages and has been one of the fastest growing segments of the home loan business in recent years.

Jim Moore, a mortgage broker in Grand Rapids, Michigan who also writes about mortgages for Miamibeach411.com, said he recently completed a $3 million refinance on a second home for a borrower who was out of work. "This wasn't even a no-documentation loan," says Moore. "This was a no-income loan, and the lender knew it."

Other brokers say they haven't had to turn away customers, either. George Duartes, who is the president of Fremont, Calif.-based Horizon Financial Associates, says his firm continues to be able to find banks who want to lend to the 30 percent of his clients who fall into the Alt-A category. "So far those clients have been able to get the loans they wanted," said Duartes.
 
10 Largest Banks: Earnings impacted by mortgages

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=a4VFaOuDnuWw&refer=news

April 11 (Bloomberg) -- National City Corp., Capital One Financial Corp. and SunTrust Banks Inc. may report lower first- quarter profits as the worst housing slump in more than a decade reduces income from mortgages.


Earnings per share for the 10 largest regional U.S. banks fell an average 1.1 percent in the first three months from a year earlier, according to analysts' estimates compiled by Bloomberg. The last decline occurred in the fourth quarter of 2004.


The end of the five-year boom in home sales reduced demand for mortgages and the fees banks earn. Delinquencies are spreading from homeowners with subprime mortgages to those with better repayment records. M&T Bank Corp., partly owned by Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc., said March 30 that defaults by people with higher credit ratings hurt first-quarter profits.
 
A Word of Advice During a Housing Slump: Rent

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/11/realestate/11leonhardt.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=slogin

A promotional spot for the National Association of Realtors came on the radio the other day. The spot, introduced as something called “Newsmakers,” was supposed to sound like a news report, with the association’s president offering real estate advice.

“This is the best time to buy,” Pat Vredevoogd Combs, the president, said cheerfully. “There’s a lot of inventory in the marketplace. Interest rates are low. It’s a wonderful tax deduction.”


By the Realtors’ way of thinking, it’s always a good time to buy. Homeownership, they argue, is a way to achieve the American dream, save on taxes and earn a solid investment return all at the same time.


That’s how it has worked out for much of the last 15 years. But in a stark reversal, it’s now clear that people who chose renting over buying in the last two years made the right move. In much of the country, including large parts of the Northeast, California, Florida and the Southwest, recent home buyers have faced higher monthly costs than renters and have lost money on their investment in the meantime. It’s almost as if they have thrown money away, an insult once reserved for renters.


Most striking, perhaps, is the fact that prices may not yet have fallen far enough for buying to look better than renting today, except for people who plan to stay in a home for many years.


With the spring moving season under way, The New York Times has done an analysis of buying vs. renting in every major metropolitan area. The analysis includes data on housing costs and looks at different possibilities for the path of home prices in coming years.


It found that even though rents have recently jumped, the costs that come with buying a home — mortgage payments, property taxes, fees to real estate agents — remain a lot higher than the costs of renting. So buyers in many places are basically betting that home prices will rise smartly in the near future.


Over the next five years, which is about the average amount of time recent buyers have remained in their homes, prices in the Los Angeles area would have to rise more than 5 percent a year for a typical buyer there to do better than a renter. The same is true in Phoenix, Las Vegas, the New York region, Northern California and South Florida. In the Boston and Washington areas, the break-even point is about 4 percent.
 
Realtors forecast first-ever annual decline in U.S. home prices

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/realtors-forecast-first-ever-annual-decline/story.aspx?guid=%7B2142F346%2DAEC0%2D441C%2D9BDB%2D5B0C382DDF93%7D&dist=bnb

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- U.S. home prices will probably fall this year for the first time in at least 38 years, the National Association of Realtors said Wednesday.


In its monthly housing outlook, the real estate industry group said tighter lending standards will cut into home sales even further than it had been projecting, driving prices lower.


Median sales prices of existing homes are now projected to fall 0.7% in 2007 before a modest 1.6% gain in 2008, the realtors said.

Since the realtors began tracking prices of single-family existing homes in 1968, the smallest price gain was 2.0% in 2006. The average gain has been 6.5%.


After adjusting for inflation, real home prices will probably decline for three straight years from 2006 through 2008.

Other housing economists have been predicting falling prices as well.


In February, Fannie Mae economist Dave Berson said he expected prices to fall about 1%, as measured by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight.

Lereah's new forecast:
  • Existing home sales down 2.2% to 6.338 million in 2007 from 6.478 million in 2006. A month ago, Lereah was forecasting a 0.9% decline. Sales fell 8.5% in 2006.
  • New-home sales down 14.1% to 904,000 in 2007 from 1.053 million in 2006. A month ago, Lereah was forecasting a 10.4% decline. Sales fell 17.9% in 2006.
  • Housing starts down 18.4% to 1.47 million in 2007 from 1.80 million in 2006. A month ago, Lereah was forecasting a 16.7% decline. Starts fell 12.9% in 2006.
  • Spending on residential construction down 13.6% to $503 billion from $582 billion in 2006. A month ago, Lereah was forecasting a 12.8% decline. Spending fell 4.2% in 2006.
 
Kellner says housing collapse was obvious

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/end-housing-bubble-should-have/story.aspx?guid=%7B080E214B%2D4E40%2D482E%2D9A1F%2DF9000ADFD296%7D

HEMPSTEAD, N.Y. (MarketWatch) -- Why are so many people so surprised that the housing market has weakened and that a growing number of loans are in default? It should have been as plain as the noses on their faces.


A roof over one's head is one of those things that everyone needs. Those who can afford to will buy while those who can't must rent.

Thirty-five years ago, in the early 1970s, the average home cost about 2-1/2 times the average family's annual income. This was considered very affordable, and so the rate of homeownership rose sharply.

But for one reason or another, home prices soon began rising faster than incomes. By the mid-1990s, they averaged almost four times the typical family's income. Affordability sank and with it homeownership.


In response, policymakers and lenders devised ways to make borrowing easier, since interest expense is the biggest cost of owning a home. These helped a bit - but they really didn't kick in until the Federal Reserve began cutting interest rates in early 2000, eventually pushing them to 45-year lows by 2003.

Since short-term rates were well below long-term rates, many people borrowed at adjustable rates, believing that rates would stay low indefinitely, or that housing prices would continue to rise indefinitely, thus enabling them to refinance at a fixed rate at some future date.


Needless to say, home prices rose even faster than before, as these lower rates (along with new types of loans and creative sales tactics) increased the effective demand for housing faster than supply.


In some areas, homes wound up costing five times the average family's income or even more. Nationwide, average home prices shot up 50% from 2000-2005 - clearly exceeding household income growth by a considerable margin.


Few were disturbed by these trends. Indeed, no less an authority than Alan Greenspan said in early 2004 (when short rates were at their lowest) that homeowners might have saved "tens of thousands of dollars" over the past decade had they held adjustable, rather than fixed-rate mortgages.

All good things must come to an end, and the end to the housing bubble (which Greenspan belatedly characterized as "froth" by 2005) came as the Fed began hiking interest rates starting in the middle of 2004.


Rising rates reduced the demand for housing, causing prices in some areas to top out and start falling. Readers of this column were informed that the party was over and that some homeowners would soon have difficulty paying off their loans.


Others missed this sign until it was too late. Now they are trying to shut the barn door after the horse has escaped.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top