• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

HUD Had No Legal Authority to Investigate Most Appraisers - and They Knew It!

kmullinix

Freshman Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2025
Professional Status
Certified Residential Appraiser
State
California
By: Kenneth Mullinix (Appraiser/ Advocate/ Activist)

From the very beginning, HUD’s bias investigations under the PAVE Task Force were illegal for one simple reason:

“HUD only has legal jurisdiction to start racial bias/discrimination-motivated investigations over FHA-insured loans”!!

They have no authority over VA loans.
They have no authority over conventional loans.
They have no authority over private transactions.

Yet HUD opened hundreds — possibly nearly 900–1,200 or more — investigations anyway.
Yet statistics show that an estimated only 12% or less of these cases involved FHA-backed loans.

Additionally, it appears that HUD deliberately kept many of these investigations open rather than referring them to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) for formal review or closure. The likely reason: HUD lacked legal standing to prosecute these cases. Had any of these investigations been forwarded to an ALJ, the first question asked would have been whether HUD had proper jurisdiction over the transaction. Because most involved non-FHA loans — VA, conventional, or private — the ALJ would have immediately recognized the jurisdictional defect and thrown the cases out. Rather than expose their unlawful overreach to judicial scrutiny, HUD chose to leave cases open indefinitely. In doing so, they artificially padded the number of "active investigations" to justify continued funding, political talking points, and media narratives — even though many of these cases were legally invalid from the start. This left hundreds of appraisers trapped for years in a system that knowingly denied them due process and weaponized investigations as a political tool rather than a lawful enforcement action.



Exact Laws and Handbook Sections HUD Violated:

  • Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. § 3608): HUD must only enforce fair housing in programs it administers — primarily FHA loans.
  • HUD Handbook 8024.1 REV-2, Page 1-5, Section 1-9 ("Jurisdictional Requirements"): HUD must verify jurisdiction BEFORE opening an investigation. Complaints involving VA or conventional loans are typically outside HUD’s authority.
  • HUD Regulation 24 CFR § 103.25: Complaints outside HUD’s jurisdiction must be referred or closed immediately — not investigated.
✅ This means every non-FHA loan investigation HUD opened was illegal from the start.

✅ It means every appraiser dragged through years of baseless investigations was denied due process and had their civil rights violated.

✅ It means HUD weaponized government power without legal authority — and appraisers across America paid the price.



Civil Rights Violations by HUD’s PAVE Task Force

HUD’s illegal overreach is not a technicality — it is a direct violation of civil rights, protected under:

  • The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (Due Process Clause)
  • The Fair Housing Act (requires jurisdiction and fair process)
  • The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (for disabled appraisers, including myself, targeted without accommodations)
But the violations didn’t stop there.

HUD conducted biased fishing expeditions, including:

  • ZIP code fishing — asking for appraisals by neighborhood or city without a specific discriminatory allegation.
HUD Handbook 8024.1 REV-2, Chapter 2, Page 2-2 ("Investigation Planning and Scope"):
"Investigations must be based on specific, articulated allegations.
Investigations must not be used for broad inquiries or searches without a specific factual basis."

And under:

24 CFR § 103.400:
"Investigations must develop specific facts relevant to the particular allegations of discrimination.
Investigations shall not be general searches without factual foundations."

✅ ZIP code fishing was illegal under HUD’s own handbook and federal law.

HUD pressured appraisers for settlements before real investigations,
ignored disability protections,
and buried jurisdictional failures —
all to create a political narrative.

This wasn’t enforcement.
It was government abuse — funded by taxpayer dollars — and now exposed.



The Bigger Picture: How PAVE Was Built on a Lie

In 2021, under an Executive Order by President Biden, the Property Appraisal and Valuation Equity (PAVE) Task Force was created.

It was marketed as a civil rights initiative — but from the start:

  • Investigations were rushed.
  • Jurisdictional checks were skipped.
  • Political headlines were prioritized over legal compliance.
  • Appraisers were sacrificed to produce "bias findings" without evidence.
By Fall 2021, HUD had committed millions to expanding PAVE —
many investigations involving VA, conventional, or private loans HUD had no legal right to touch.

In March 2022, HUD celebrated supposed "findings" of bias —
while hundreds of appraisers were being illegally targeted.

Today, while PAVE has effectively collapsed,
the civil rights violations it unleashed are still fresh — and accountability is coming.



Documented Violations of Law and Handbook

HUD’s misconduct violated:

  • HUD Handbook 8024.1 REV-2, Page 1-5 (Jurisdictional Requirements)
  • HUD Handbook 8024.1 REV-2, Page 2-2 (No broad fishing expeditions without specific allegations)
  • 24 CFR § 103.25 (Must close or refer out-of-jurisdiction complaints)
  • 24 CFR § 103.400 (Specific facts required for investigations)
  • Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. § 3608)
  • Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.)
  • Fifth Amendment Due Process Rights
Every non-FHA case opened was a direct violation of federal law and civil rights.



My Story: Fighting Back Against an Illegal Investigation

I was targeted under HUD’s illegal PAVE initiative — despite working on VA loans HUD had no right to investigate.

For four years: (1 year after appraisal on 11-0-2021 homeowner filed racial case/ 1 year for VA investigation to conclude/ homeowner filed again with HUD now a 27-month long investigation from HUD- still open):

An estimation:

  • Wrote and estimated 500-750 pages defending myself.
  • Filed multiple FOIA requests to uncover the truth with HUD/ VA.
  • Filed a whistleblower complaint with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel.
  • Filed a case with the Department of Justice
  • Informed the Legal Counsel of HUD about the abuse/case
  • Filed a police report- break in of my office
  • Contacted numerous media outlets
  • Contacted congressmen and other government agencies
  • Wrote the Inspector General’s Office at HUD multiple times
  • Filed a GAO FraudNet report exposing HUD’s misuse of taxpayer funds.
  • Filed an EEOC disability retaliation complaint.
Through it all, I endured:

  • Constant emotional stress
  • Worsening PTSD
  • Insomnia/ sleep disorders
  • Shingles outbreaks
  • Anxiety/ panic attacks
  • Financial damage
  • Reputational harm
I am not alone.
Appraisers across the country have been contacting me with similar stories. I have an estimated 20-25 personal stories about HUD investigations so far.



⚖️ Building Toward Class Action Status

Because HUD’s illegal actions affected hundreds — possibly thousands — of appraisers,
I am actively preparing for future class action litigation.

✅ If you were investigated by HUD for a VA, conventional, or private loan or were investigated and cleared by your own state agency then investigated a second time by HUD
✅ If you were pressured without evidence, especially to settle early
✅ If you suffered damages or retaliation...

Please contact me at kjmull@aol.com

Include:

  • Loan type (VA, conventional, private)
  • Dates of HUD contact
  • Any settlement pressure
  • Description of damages (emotional, professional, financial)
Together, we will make history — and hold HUD accountable.



FOIA Reports Are Coming: HUD’s Illegal Numbers Will Be Public Soon

Pending FOIA requests will soon reveal:


  • How many cases HUD opened, and closed, how long they were open for etc…?
  • How many involved FHA loans.
  • How many were illegally opened without jurisdiction.
The evidence is coming —
and HUD will not be able to spin it away.



Legal Disclosure

This article constitutes protected whistleblower activity under:

  • Whistleblower Protection Act (5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8))
  • First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution
  • Federal Civil Rights Laws
Any retaliation will be immediately reported to federal oversight agencies.



The Reckoning Has Just Begun

HUD gambled that no one would notice.
That appraisers would stay silent.
That PAVE could hide behind headlines and slogans.

They were wrong.

The era of silence is over.
The era of reckoning has begun.

Contact me: kjmull@aol.com





 
Not true HUD enforces Racial Civil Rights Violations, involving all residential real estate, including rentals. NOW THE ARGUMENT can be made that Pave was abusing and overstepping its authority but that's another Supreme Court Case issue or Congress has to repeal the Pave Act. Joe Biden passed it not congress.
 
Deleted.
 
Last edited:
Not true HUD enforces Racial Civil Rights Violations, involving all residential real estate, including rentals. NOW THE ARGUMENT can be made that Pave was abusing and overstepping its authority but that's another Supreme Court Case issue or Congress has to repeal the Pave Act. Joe Biden passed it not congress.
I have researched the law on this and if you read the letter I wrote use AI and look for yourself. If this does not effect you then there is no reason for you to be committing on this subject. Good luck.
 
I have researched the law on this and if you read the letter I wrote use AI and look for yourself. If this does not effect you then there is no reason for you to be committing on this subject. Good luck
I agree it's terrible what HUD and Pave did to appraisers.They used Gestapo tactics and ruined people's lifes, but I also have some experience with good attorney's that wouldn't touch it and walked away because there was nothing illegal done as Pave was promoted by the Biden office abd Administration and HUD had the authority.

To say it was illegal is at this point is a opinion by some, but until the Federal Courts or SCOTUS declares it illegal or unconstitutional it's a mute point.

Someone will have to take the case and be prepared to spend years in Federal Courts and expect many appeals by HUD.
 
I have researched the law on this and if you read the letter I wrote use AI and look for yourself. If this does not effect you then there is no reason for you to be committing on this subject. Good luck.
Every appraiser has an economic interest and a moral interest in the fair and just resolution of any allegations of systemic racism or the broad accusation that a large percentage of appraisers are racists. Not just the appraisers who get accused as an individual. These allegations don't just affect the accused. If left unchecked the trend could eventually put us all out of business. The one primary attribute that we sell to our users - that nobody else contributes to the transaction - is our objectivity and impartiality. Without that the rest of our work is unmarketable.

The other reason you should embrace the viewpoints of appraisers who aren't (yet) directly in the line of fire is precisely because not being in the line of fire enables a little more objectivity WRT certain aspects of these accusations. I have no idea if your counterargument has any holes in it, but if it does you are better served having one of your peers pointing that out to you sooner rather than later.
 
Last edited:
I agree it's terrible what HUD and Pave did to appraisers.They used Gestapo tactics and ruined people's lifes, but I also have some experience with good attorney's that wouldn't touch it and walked away because there was nothing illegal done as Pave was promoted by the Biden office abd Administration and HUD had the authority.

To say it was illegal is at this point is a opinion by some, but until the Federal Courts or SCOTUS declares it illegal or unconstitutional it's a mute point.

Someone will have to take the case and be prepared to spend years in Federal Courts and expect many appeals by HUD.
Years is the most appropriate estimate, as they have Unlimited resources as a Federal Agency. (IE: Wells & BOA over the years have been fined $Millions for fraud etc. and they are still in business)
 
When they have a very big stick to beat you with, they don't need to be right. It's a typical gov method, bankrupt you with attorney costs. So what if they lose, nada happens.
 
“Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law"

... :rof:
 
MISREPRESENTATION TO THE HOMEOWNER

“HUD Misled the Complainant (Homeowner) Too — A Two-Sided Deception”

Prepared for EEOC Review | Kenneth J. Mullinix | May 2025

While this report primarily outlines the civil rights violations and procedural abuse committed against me as a disabled federal contractor, this addendum documents how the homeowner who filed the complaint was also misled by HUD — in many of the same ways. This two-sided deception implicates HUD in not only violating due process for the accused but also undermining the rights and expectations of the complainant.


1. What the Law Requires in a Legal Complaint

Under the Fair Housing Act (FHA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601–3619, any person who believes they have been subjected to housing discrimination must file a formal complaint with HUD using Form HUD-903.1. A valid complaint must:

  • Identify a basis for discrimination under a protected class (e.g., race, color, religion, national origin, sex, familial status, or disability)
  • Be signed under penalty of perjury
  • Trigger a jurisdictional review per 24 CFR § 103.25
  • If found valid, be entered into TEAPOTS (Government Evidence Storage)(Title Eight Automated Paperless Office Tracking System)
  • Be assigned a formal HUD case number
  • Be investigated under an official plan as required by HUD Handbook 8024.1 REV-2, Chapter 5
HUD must also notify the complainant of:

  • Their rights and responsibilities
  • Whether the case has jurisdiction
  • The eventual outcome of the case (via written closure or referral to an ALJ or DOJ)

2. What the Homeowner Likely Signed Under PAVE

In my case — and based on FOIA disclosures — the complainant did not submit a sworn HUD-903.1 complaint. Instead, HUD appears to have conducted a verbal or informal intake interview and used it to create a risk assessment file, not a legal complaint.

  • No TEAPOTS case number was ever assigned
  • No Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) referral or final findings were issued
  • No formal notification of closure was ever sent to the homeowner
  • To date, no HUD-903.1 Fair Housing Complaint Form signed by the complainant has been produced. Under 24 CFR § 103.25 and HUD Handbook 8024.1 REV-2, a signed complaint form is legally required before a jurisdictional review, TEAPOTS case opening, or investigative action can be taken.
  • The absence of this document — confirmed by FOIA — establishes that no legal complaint was filed, and therefore no lawful investigation ever commenced. This raises serious questions about HUD’s invocation of FOIA Exemption 7(A) and the legitimacy of the PAVE program’s enforcement metrics."
The homeowner was never advised that their claim would not be reviewed under federal law or that HUD had no jurisdiction due to the property being appraised under a VA loan, which falls under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs — not HUD.


3. Why This Was Misleading and Harmful

HUD misrepresented to the homeowner that their complaint was being addressed under federal civil rights law. In fact:

  • There was no formal complaint on file
  • No legal action could ever occur due to jurisdictional ineligibility
  • The homeowner was never told this truth
  • They were used to create an “open case” metric for the PAVE Task Force
This not only harmed me as the appraiser but defrauded the complainant, who likely believed justice was being pursued on their behalf. That complaint became nothing more than an intake record, abandoned once its administrative purpose was fulfilled.


4. Relevant Legal and Policy Violations

The misrepresentation to the homeowner may constitute violations of:

  • Fair Housing Act procedural obligations (24 CFR § 103.25 and § 103.400)
  • 18 U.S.C. § 1001 – False statements to federal officials or the public (e.g., if HUD publicly claimed these were active legal cases)
  • 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729–3733 (False Claims Act) – Misusing complaint data to justify federal grant funding under PAVE
  • Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. § 794) – If disabled complainants were similarly deceived
  • 5 U.S.C. § 552a (Privacy Act) – If complaint data was used outside its lawful purpose
  • HUD Handbook 8024.1 REV-2 – For failure to open a legal case, issue findings, or close the file properly

5. Conclusion: A Double Deception

This case is no longer about just me, the appraiser. The entire structure of the PAVE enforcement program — as applied by HUD Region IX — appears to have been built on administrative illusions that harmed both the accused and the accuser.

The homeowner believed they were filing a real complaint. I believed I was under real investigation.
Neither of us were told the truth.

This double-deception strategy reveals the PAVE initiative as not a civil rights enforcement program, but a data fabrication and grant-justification engine. The harm done to homeowners — by raising false expectations and delivering no closure — deserves the same attention and accountability as the harm done to appraisers.

This matter should be referred to:

  • The EEOC for systemic civil rights abuse
  • The HUD Office of Inspector General (OIG) for audit and fraud review
  • The U.S. Department of Justice for potential False Claims Act violations

 
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top