Overimprovement
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 31, 2017
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Kentucky
A quick thought on NAR. The reason they wield so much power is that realtors in a very practical way HAVE to join that org to access the local MLS. But, you will say, so do appraisers. True, but the NAR doesn't represent appraisers, they represent realtor interests, which are actually quite different.
I really think the stranglehold local MLS's have on transaction data is nearing an end. More and more info is going public, and the sarcastically funny thing is more and more MLS's are being taken over by the CoreLogics of the world. They don't realize they are selling their livelihood to the devil when they do that. They are, one-MLS-at-a-time, losing control of their only real precious commodity--transaction data. I predict by 2030, most MLS's will be owned by a few large data warehouses. Definitely trending in that direction. And every time a realtor does a property "inspection", they are inadvertently feeding the machine as well.
But why was each locality able to put such a stranglehold on the data to begin with? Because before computers, transaction data was on cards at some local office (many of us remember getting 'comps' that way). But it was local to each community/city/county. With usually one organization holding the key, anyone who wanted to play...had to pay. That simply morphed into the local MLS's, or more precisely, the local Boards of Realtors, which controlled all the data. It's always been about the data, and always will be.
Appraisers have never had that, but I continue to assert that if all the appraisers in one area got together, and just talked, they could affect real change. Just the exchange of knowledge on what is going on with AMCs, PDCs, waivers, staff appraising, etc, would be beneficial. Historically, appraisers locked up their personal knowledge in a vault. But as more and more get desperate just to keep the shingle hung, I think more and more would be willing to share info. Obviously the larger the city, the more unlikely this is. But as always, it HAS to start locally.
I really think the stranglehold local MLS's have on transaction data is nearing an end. More and more info is going public, and the sarcastically funny thing is more and more MLS's are being taken over by the CoreLogics of the world. They don't realize they are selling their livelihood to the devil when they do that. They are, one-MLS-at-a-time, losing control of their only real precious commodity--transaction data. I predict by 2030, most MLS's will be owned by a few large data warehouses. Definitely trending in that direction. And every time a realtor does a property "inspection", they are inadvertently feeding the machine as well.
But why was each locality able to put such a stranglehold on the data to begin with? Because before computers, transaction data was on cards at some local office (many of us remember getting 'comps' that way). But it was local to each community/city/county. With usually one organization holding the key, anyone who wanted to play...had to pay. That simply morphed into the local MLS's, or more precisely, the local Boards of Realtors, which controlled all the data. It's always been about the data, and always will be.
Appraisers have never had that, but I continue to assert that if all the appraisers in one area got together, and just talked, they could affect real change. Just the exchange of knowledge on what is going on with AMCs, PDCs, waivers, staff appraising, etc, would be beneficial. Historically, appraisers locked up their personal knowledge in a vault. But as more and more get desperate just to keep the shingle hung, I think more and more would be willing to share info. Obviously the larger the city, the more unlikely this is. But as always, it HAS to start locally.
