Hybrid

[George Hatch]

There will be a checkbox appraiser did not inspect, but the inspector party will not be individually named in the appraisal (from what I am aware of ), nor will there be verbiage that the inspector contributed significant appraisal assistance 1) because they are not an appraiser and 2) because the inspector will not relate opinions about what they saw, just transmit what they saw.

So there's no way for the appraiser to be specific about the various sources of data they used?

You are like a politician, arguing for,/ against something at the same time! In another post you said you don't think it 's good to use hybrids for origination work, yet you make an argument for it.

I have made no argument "for" hybrids. What I've been saying is that they can be done per USPAP and doing one isn't necessarily a crime. To whatever extent the lenders are allowed to engage and use them, appraisers are allowed to accept those engagements and perform those assignments.

 

[Meandering]

There are many ways to screw over peers.

No one ever implied you were a skippy generator.

.

 

[George Hatch]

IMO, adding trainees to a saturated market AND pimping stupid themes to our peers in social media are both ways to screw those peers over.

You have repeatedly implied that I work for the AMCs despite my repeated denials. Since I've already denied it, you continuing to accuse me of it basically amounts to calling me a liar.

 

[J Grant]

So there's no way for the appraiser to be specific about the various sources of data they used?

Not sure What do you think...from what I have read, no,

I wonder if the name of the inspector will even be provided to the appraiser? Or will the appraiser just get pictures and some notes from a "source".? Will the appraiser be allowed to speak to the inspector, or not allowed as it would impact "efficiency" ?

 

[J Grant]

You have repeatedly implied that I work for the AMCs despite my repeated denials. Since I've already denied it, you continuing to accuse me of it basically amounts to calling me a liar.

Who? Not me...not sure who you are referring to.

 

[George Hatch]

I'm responding to Marion's repeated allegations.

 

[George Hatch]

Not sure What do you think...from what I have read, no,

I wonder if the name of the inspector will even be provided to the appraiser? Or will the appraiser just get pictures and some notes from a "source".? Will the appraiser be allowed to speak to the inspector, or not allowed as it would impact "efficiency" ?

Is there only one hybrid program out there? I thought we were talking about a *type* of appraisal service, not necessarily any single application.

 

[Terrel L. Shields]

they really can't seem to accept that Physical Inspection is not a USPAP requirement nor is the use of assistants. A re

We are well aware of the physical inspection aspect. Problem. We are seriously regulated about using an assistant in my state. We have to take a class to even have a trainee. Hybrid inspectors are not our assistant. The result is we must appraise something with information we may not trust prepared by people who may not be competent nor trustworthy.
You and George are saying clients trump USPAP as well as the state board. They dictate the SOW. Our choice is agree or eschew the work. If this doesn't ultimately bite us in the butt, I don't see how anything will. So just write a number on a postcard. So why not eliminate the inspector and simply guess at the condition...you know, like Zillow does? We are complicit in dumbing down our expertise as well as carving off a huge chunk of the potential income meaning we need no trainees and about half the CRs need to surrender their license.

 

[Meandering]

IMO, adding trainees to a saturated market AND pimping stupid themes to our peers in social media are both ways to screw those peers over.

You have repeatedly implied that I work for the AMCs despite my repeated denials. Since I've already denied it, you continuing to accuse me of it basically amounts to calling me a liar.

And what is your stake in selling work you won't do, to those that don't read the regulations?

Lots of time spent selling something for no benefit, and you think it's such a great idea, you won't do it.

.

 

[Meandering]

I'm responding to Marion's repeated allegations.

Not allegations,

But no short term memory loss here.

It was you who commented about your relationship with DW,

when DW had a question,
you posted the poll
and Timmy got upset over the answers.

I'm sure even JGrant remembers that little game of get them to do it anyway.


.