Hybrid

[Eli]

(my bold)

I was wondering when and/or if you were going to hedge your bet.

However, let me offer you some information which, while not specifically helping your cause, may create a longer FTC hearing process than what exists now:
One of the decisions from SCOTUS that just came out was a case involving the SEC and their administrative law judge appointment process. Here is an article that goes into detail...

https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=28994663-2165-47df-abba-8abc27caca6a​

but the gist is that if the ALJs are not appointed using the proper procedure, their past rulings and current pending cases may be thrown out and a new hearing from a properly appointed ALJ may be required (if the agency wants to pursue the action).

BTW, I heard on a sports radio channel that California is looking at splitting into two States. Have you heard that?

 

[DWiley]

Even standard 3 reviews don't do a proper job of determining if a appraisal is good. I am sure your stupid box checking clerks are fully qualified to determine appraisal quality.

You have an open invitation to stop by and look at the scoring process anytime you wish. I will even get one of the 100+ appraisers that we employ to walk you through it if I am not in town

 

[hastalavista]

BTW, I heard on a sports radio channel that California is looking at splitting into two States. Have you heard that?

The two-state split has comes up every now again (north/south). But now, there is talk about splitting into three states.
Let's call one the "coastal" state and that would be concentrated mostly along the Southern & Central California coastline (although I think it extends eastward along the US/Mexico Border.
The other one is Northern California, but would include San Francisco.
The third would be mostly Central California which contains much of our agricultural resources.

I like the idea of splitting the state up. IMO, the political power is too concentrated in the high-density urban areas. What is important to an urbanite might be detrimental to a farmer.

 

[Joe Flacco]

You have an open invitation to stop by and look at the scoring process anytime you wish. I will even get one of the 100+ appraisers that we employ to walk you through it if I am not in town

Where are you? I would rather stop by when you are in town.

 

[Eli]

The two-state split has comes up every now again (north/south). But now, there is talk about splitting into three states.
Let's call one the "coastal" state and that would be concentrated mostly along the Southern & Central California coastline (although I think it extends eastward along the US/Mexico Border.
The other one is Northern California, but would include San Francisco.
The third would be mostly Central California which contains much of our agricultural resources.

I like the idea of splitting the state up. IMO, the political power is too concentrated in the high-density urban areas. What is important to an urbanite might be detrimental to a farmer.

It’s political no doubt based on what I heard. It’s getting serious according to a “sports” radio channel. I am not kidding.

 

[Joe Flacco]

I am 100% sure I would leave Servicelink unimpressed. It is probably worse than I even think.

 

[timd354]

Louisiana is not in a defensive position.

Yet, somehow the LREAB finds itself in the dock as the respondent (defendant) to a FTC antitrust complaint for which they have hired very expensive outside counsel to defend.

 

[Eli]

Yet, somehow the LREAB finds itself in the dock as the respondent (defendant) to a FTC antitrust complaint for which they have honed very expensive outside counsel to defend.

Don’t always judge a book by it’s cover. Throwing rocks in a glass house is a bad idea.

Obviously you and I are not Antitrust law experts. Let’s leave antitrust law to lawyers.

 

[Eli]

We may have 51 States or more soon. I am not kidding.

 

[hastalavista]

We may have 51 States or more soon. I am not kidding.

It may be premature to count that 51st state as being a carve-out of California. As I understand it, not only would the voters need to approve it but Congress needs to approve it as well.

Here's an article (the first one I found... so it may be fake news for all I know):
http://www.businessinsider.com/how-california-could-become-three-states-cal3-ballot-measure-2018-6