The appraiser believes the source of the property characteristics is reliable based upon,
The information was provided to the appraiser via an interested party - the agent of the lender, who,
refused to disclose the name and qualifications of the person who "inspected" the interior of the property, and,
I thoroughly believe is credible, until they don't pay me and don't answer their phones and disappear into the abyss like so many of their former brethren.
Yup, can't get more reliable based on those certs.
Lulz
So what passes for due diligence and due care? Well, I already knew the correct answer to that question before you even brought it up. Actually, the answer to your challenge is part of the lesson plan.
View attachment 35918
I can do this all day long. Note that the measure is framed in terms of the expectations of the appraiser's peers (which is a defined term) and the power users for the "similar assignment". Not all types of assignments.
Had they meant all assignments they would have said all assignments. Again, the wording they chose was no accident.
Oh come on George, that's a two part answer.
The evidence of the expectations of the
partIES who are regularly intended intended users for similar assignments is????? Where????
Certainly not in the IAEG, and not in the TILA for higher priced mortgages.
12 cfr 226.43
(c)Appraisals required -
(1)In general. Except as provided in
paragraph (b) of this section, a
creditor shall not extend a higher-priced mortgage loan to a
consumer without obtaining, prior to
consummation, a written appraisal of the property to be mortgaged.
The appraisal must be performed by a certified or licensed appraiser who conducts a physical visit of the interior of the property that will secure the transaction.
So where is that rule or evidence that the regularly intended users expect any desktop/hybrid/bi-f appraisal is credible for lending?
.